Skocz do zawartości


Zawartość użytkownika fortyck

Odnotowano 682 pozycji dodanych przez fortyck (Rezultat wyszukiwania ograniczony do daty: 24-sierpień 18 )



Sortuj według                Sortuj  

#19613 Jean-Michel Jarre - aktualności

Napisano przez fortyck w 24 sierpień 2018 - 11:18 w Jean-Michel Jarre

Very happy to finally release COACHELLA OPENING.

 

A track I composed for the festival show this spring.

 

It’s based on the repetitive and hypnotic sequences that only electronic instruments can create.

 

Your reactions to the track were so positive that I have now added it to the PLANET JARRE package.

 

Let me know how you enjoy the studio version.

 

 

You can now listen to the full track and the little „Behind the track Story“ here: 


https://forms.sonymu...mj-pj-playlist/

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Żródło: https://www.facebook...eanmicheljarre/




#19617 Tragedia na Przełęczy Diatłowa (1/2 luty 1959 r.)

Napisano przez fortyck w 24 sierpień 2018 - 19:33 w Ogólne

44243218741_e31a4cd653_o.jpg

 

44194555642_423c1d3c42_o.jpg

 

44243218431_564558d4cc_o.jpg




#19626 Tragedia na Przełęczy Diatłowa (1/2 luty 1959 r.)

Napisano przez fortyck w 27 sierpień 2018 - 19:24 w Ogólne

43402003365_9c8ffe5526_o.jpg




#19640 Jean-Michel Jarre - aktualności

Napisano przez fortyck w 28 sierpień 2018 - 20:49 w Jean-Michel Jarre

An event that I will forever connect with the tragic death of my friend Ron McNair, Challenger-Astronaut and Saxofonist with whom I was planning to perform "Rendezvous“.

 

Him up in space, me on stage.

 

Shortly before the concert the Challenger exploded and Ron and six other astronauts died.

 

I did not want to play this show, but his friends encouraged me to do so.

 

I’m glad we did it as a way to remember Ron, a great man and friend.

 

29394650107_c4395054a2_o.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Żródło: https://www.facebook...eanmicheljarre/




#19642 50 years of music

Napisano przez fortyck w 29 sierpień 2018 - 19:33 w Video

50 years of music - 1978 (cz. 3)

 

 

On September 14th 2018 Jean-Michel Jarre releases his ultimate Best Of PLANET JARRE - 50 YEARS OF MUSIC.

 

This #JMJSeries will lead you through Jean-Michel Jarre's special moments of the past 50 years.

 

The third episode is about the concepts of his first albums Oxygene, Equinoxe and Magnetic Fields.

 

 

 

Jean-Michel Jarre “Planet Jarre – 50 Years Of Music”: https://lnk.to/JMJ-PlanetJarre

 

Jean-Michel Jarre - Subscribe here: http://www.youtube.c...er/jeanmiche...

 

More from Jean-Michel Jarre: Oxygene, Pt. 4: https://youtu.be/kSIMVnPA994

 

Choose your music service to listen to Jean-Michel Jarre: https://jean-michel-jarre.lnk.to/JMJ

 

 

Follow Jean-Michel Jarre:

 

Website: https://jeanmicheljarre.com/

Facebook: https://www.facebook...jeanmicheljarre

Twitter: https://twitter.com/jeanmicheljarre

Instagram: https://www.instagra.../jeanmichelj...




#19656 Jean-Michel Jarre - aktualności

Napisano przez fortyck w 30 sierpień 2018 - 19:45 w Jean-Michel Jarre

We did a nice little animated video for my new track COACHELLA OPENING its now up on YouTube 

 


Hope you enjoy it.

 

 

Clip by UBER Eck

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Żródło: https://www.facebook...eanmicheljarre/




#19658 Tragedia na Przełęczy Diatłowa (1/2 luty 1959 r.)

Napisano przez fortyck w 30 sierpień 2018 - 20:03 w Ogólne

30503656188_7f4f6a3f3e_o.jpg




#19671 Tragedia na Przełęczy Diatłowa (1/2 luty 1959 r.)

Napisano przez fortyck w 03 wrzesień 2018 - 19:33 w Ogólne

29516575167_395731c3ec_o.jpg

 

Vladimir Borzenkov analysis of frame 34
The last shot of Yuri (Georgiy) Krivonischenko's camera became very popular.
Here is a link to the original scan.
29516739947_4d774bd11a_o.jpg
The negative of frame 34
There is an opinion that the last frame Krivonischenko captured the falling stage of the rocket.
Perhaps the tourists photographed the test flight of the R-12 rocket, launched from the Kapustin Yar test site.
If conspiracy ambassadors have this immense "fantasy allowance" on the topic "to think up something unreal, based on the lack of real facts", then why can't we present something real if there are real facts available for it?
I believe that there is nothing mysterious in this frame.
All mystery lives only in the minds of conspiracy theorists.
It should be noted that most qualified amateur and professional photographers basically share a point of view similar to mine.
The fact that there is nothing unusual in it and that the shot is "technical" and made entirely by accident.
If you look at this image from the point of view of a qualified photographer who dealt with chemical photography (shooting on a photosensitive film and developing it in photo chemicals), then nothing special can be found in it.
Distinguishable objects (areas) of the image
43545486125_78393630e9_o.jpg
Distinguishable objects (areas) of the image
Main and significant
  1. A rectangular light spot (this is all said for a positive image) in the middle of the left side,
  2. 8 faced polyhedron (octahedron) in the center of the frame,
  3. Whitish wide blurred strip from the rectangle up and to the right.

 

Secondary
  1. Thin strip in bend shape
  2. From the center of the frame to the right there are rows of surface scratches, the cause of which is contact with the metal surfaces of the transport unit of the camera film (flat pressing surface of the back cover of the camera), as well as mechanical defects from careless handling of the film. Weak longitudinal bands are the result of multiple folding and or dragging of the film along the glass of the photo enlarger), or something like that.
  3. An area of whitish exposition, not as intense in brightness as object No. 3 (the brightest area in the image) and "covering" almost half of the frame, where the main analyzed objects are located. It can easily be removed by means of image processing (for example, increasing the contrast), which was done on most of the images published on the web.

 

Concerning the exposure of the image, it can be said that it was produced without focusing on the sharpness, from a dark room to a light object, for example, an open tent canopy.
The white octahedron in the center of the frame is an optical effect.
Errors in focusing can occur due to the following: - this was neglected, - range finder was defective, - or when the viewfinder fogs up.
Exposure was quite permissible, that is called "by hand".
This follows from the fact that there is almost nothing "smeared".
In any case, this is not visible.
At exposure times of the shutter greater than ¼, ½ sec, this usually does not work.
By the way, such excerpts and there is not on that camera ("Zorki" №486963), which was used to filmed this frame.
Surely the camera settings before this "last shot" were installed in relation to the illumination, the two penultimate frames.
When the group goes in conditions of poor visibility already in the woodland.
And the shutter speed, aperture, and the focusing distance to the sharpness (depth of field), most likely, did not change.
If you start to analyze all these objects, you can get the following explanations:
Object №2
It's easiest to explain the presence of the octahedron (object №2).
This effect often appears when a thin beam of light enters the lens in such a way that it does not fall directly into the photographic material field, but is reflected from the side surfaces of the objective lens to form an image of the diaphragm's petals.
When shooting against the light due to internal reflections in the lens, a parasitic light may appear on the pictures - in the form of glare.
Such a glare comes from a bright source, for example, the sun, a light bulb in a room or a lamppost, etc.
The source itself does not have to be in the frame.
Virtually all lenses, except the simplest, consist of several "optical elements".
This is the lenses themselves and assemblies of several lenses.
Glare initiates a light that is outside the limits of the image on the frame.
This light, instead of passing through the normal optical path, is reflected from the optical elements inside (an arbitrary number of times) before it reaches the film.
Modern optical elements usually have different anti-reflective coatings that are designed to eliminate glare, but no multi-lens can not completely eliminate them.
The rays from the light sources will still be reflected inside and this reflected light will be in the frame in the form of highlights in areas where it will be comparable in intensity with the light of the main image.
Glare in the form of polygons are caused by light, which is reflected from the inner surfaces of the lens.
43545485685_022b056373_o.jpg
Formation of "false" images on film
That there might be reflections caused by internal re-reflections, it is necessary to have external high-brightness lighting sources.
Such sources can be the sun, artificial lighting. Such "random light" can get into the lens if it hits the front lens of the lens. Usually, the light outside the angle of the lens does not affect the resulting image, but if this light is reflected from the inner parts of the lens, it can go through an unintended path and get on the film.
If we say "in general", then it should be noted that in modern lenses, effective anti-glare coatings are usually used. Some old lenses, for example, Leica, Hasselblad, Zeiss, FED until 1948, and all Soviet (and most foreign) cameras that were produced at an earlier time do not have any special coatings, and therefore can highlight very much even with a soft light.
Sometimes this technique (a specially generated occurrence of highlights) is used by photographers to obtain a special artistic effect, or to "liven up" a photograph.
The octahedron is a reflection of the shape of the diaphragm of this lens.
This is a common phenomenon when shooting against the sun or another bright light source.
For this effect, you need a narrow bright beam that enters the lens.
This was not a problem at the site of the search camp in 1959.
The sun was just from the entrance to the tent, and it was very simple to find a flat snowflake "at a very obtuse angle", like a "mirrored dot".
Such effects are not uncommon.
Here is one example from my own practice.
This picture was taken with "Praktica LTL3" by "Pentacon Dresden" (GDR).
43737173164_ff8911e529_o.jpg
Illustration for diaphragm imaging
This picture also clearly shows the pentagon of the diaphragm of the Zeiss lens «Pancolar – 1,8/50».
In the example above, the sun practically did not hit the frame, but nevertheless caused pentagon glare.
On the exemplary frame there are a few pentagons (in contrast to the frame from Krivonischenko's film), but the Zeiss lens is more complex, and has several groups of lenses.
In addition, he more sharply "draws" the image.
Therefore, you can see even the weakest parts of the highlights.
What contributes to more and more perfect (and also colored) Film of a later period.
In my photo the appearance of the "polygon" in the frame is not accidental, I tried to achieve this artistic effect when I was shooting.
The photo from Dyatlov group was made through another, simpler lens - Industar-22, which has an octahedron diaphragm.
This is what I have on the pictures of my study - same lens, even about the same years of release, «Industar-22» with aperture 1:8 is shown on the picture below.
43737173064_2d7dff89cb_o.jpg
The shape of the diaphragm of the lens «Industar-22»
What can you find about this lens in the literature?
"It gives a very specific glare - a sharply outlined image of the diaphragm.
This is due to the fact that it has flat surfaces on the front lens and on the last component (or close to flat ones, it is difficult to obtain a technologically difficult plane, so it is made weakly convex).
Thus, the scattered light does not spread throughout the image field but concentrates in These reflections diminish the scattered light and improve tonal transmission on exactly two enlightened surfaces - as if there are gluing, which is characteristic."
Prof. D.S. Volosov, Photographic Optics, 2nd ed., Moscow:" «Art», 1978.
 
Well-defined facets have a glare as in the above picture, they can also be seen in the "last" photo of Dyatlov group.
Despite the blurred image.
From all that has been said, we can state that when shooting, there was a thin, non-divergent, bright beam of light.
This could only be: a ray of sun - in nature, or artificial - a laser beam. And obviously not red color, because all the films used in 1959 had a sensitivity dip in the "red" range.
Hoping for a green laser in 1959 would be too presumptuous.
Actually as a laser in general, in the same place, in that period.
There is also a completely reliable explanation of where this ray could come from.
There is an assumption that this picture was taken in the tent of the search group after the camera G. Krivonischenko was brought there.
This has already been clarified among the participants of the searches (I specified this in V.G. Karelin and P.I. Bartolomey).
The tent of their group in the region of Auspiya stood on the clearing by the entrance almost exactly to the south.
Therefore, in sunny weather, a thin ray from the sun could easily appear, which reflected from one of the numerous ice crystals (frost) formed at low negative temperatures.
In the winter of 2014 and 2015, I myself have seen many such "microchips" of ice crystals many times in the same place where the search group's tent stood in 1959.
Object №1
Object №1 (from the list), is a rectangle very close to a square.
Therefore, its original original form and image in principle can not have a different form.
In optics, there is a clear pattern in the distortion of the shape with a loss of focus - a square object, due to the loss of image clarity, can approach the shape of the circle.
But it's never the other way around.
Therefore, we can safely assume that the original object is rectangular.
And having a great brightness.
A bright spot is perceived as a source of bright light, much higher intensity, relative to the surrounding room.
And if you compare with the environment - at least more than an order of magnitude greater than any object on the frame near and more than the «exposure latitude» * of films of that period.
The room itself, where the picture was taken, is quite dark.
In any case, strongly obscured, relative to the external light background.
This object was filmed, not specifically, that is, it was not exactly shot.
From all that has been said, we can confidently assume that the «square» in the frame is the entrance to the tent that was opened.
Below it will be told where it could be with the greatest degree of probability.
And what could be this object.
* «exposure latitude» - the extent to which a light-sensitive material can be overexposed or underexposed and still achieve an acceptable result.
This measure is used for digital and analogue processes, i.e. optical microlithography or photography.
Object №3
The second, lighter than the background, but the "translucent" outline refers to «object №3».
Let's take a fragment of this image:
29516739597_4dd975032a_o.jpg
Objects №1 and 3 on frame 34
It most of all resembles a translucent gaseous medium, such as steam, finely dispersed suspension or something similar.
It seems that this "something" rises upwards, since it is lighter than air in the room, and with a brightly bright light from the area «Object №1», indicated in this picture as «exit».
Most of all, this resembles a cloud of steam (as indicated in the diagram above), formed from the cold air from the street into the tent of the rescuers, in which the stove was heated.
It is moisture condensing in cold air with back light.
Such a trace is obtained by condensing water vapor inside a warm tent, when outside cold air, illuminated by the bright external light of a sunny day, bursts into the door.
This state is very typical for this kind of state of the tent.
This was constantly observed in practice under similar conditions.
There is always an excess of moisture from constantly drying clothes, and a couple, from cooking and eating food in the cold.
The necessary physical conditions for this are: - great difference in air temperatures outside and inside - the presence of a humidity level near the condensation point - excess of such moist air - open entrance (draft) - back light
All these conditions are completely characteristic for conditions of the type that were in the tent of the search group in 1959.
It is unlikely, but it is still possible that this train can be considered a reflection of light on the canopy of the wall of the tent.
But then there must be a large reflecting surface next to the entrance.
Although there is nothing surprising in the fact that there was a lot of snow around.
A few words about the general blur of the image….
Notable for this photo is also the fact that all the details of the image on it are outside the depth of field of the lens.
The last shot, judging by the complete lack of focus throughout the frame, was made on condition that the operator did not have time (or did not intend) to extend the lens barrel to the end when photographing.
Most likely, I did not have time to change the exposition.
When the tube is not fully extended, the projection image is not on the plane of the film (as in the "normal mode"), but on the plane located behind the film.
Therefore, a blurred image is obtained, and with a completely non-extended lens tube, a circle is obtained.
On the two pictures below this is clearly visible.
29516739837_a2527b989e_o.jpg
Lens tube protruding Lens tube not extended at all
The case of a completely non-extended lens is excluded, because it would produce the following image:
43545486065_cca0a6b71b_o.jpg
The image obtained with a completely non-extended lens of «Industar-22»
In Dyatlov group films there is such a frame. SKAN_6_002.jpg – scan from film №6 (this is the numbering in the initial scan).
«Industar-22» has the same optical system as its prototype «Tessar» from 1902.
29516739857_9b0824463b_o.png
Optical scheme of lenses «Industar-22» is same as «Tessar»
In order to take a picture, the lens should be pushed from the inside to the stop and fixed on the bayonet lens mount.
Bayonet lens mount - this is the type of fixation when required, push it forward and insert it into the grooves, turning it all the way to the small angle.
As will be shown in the pictures below.
43545485945_94c67fc27c_o.png
A. The lens is extended but the bayonet lock is not closed (the flange is not in the slots of the lens housing) B. The lens is extended and the bayonet lock is closed (the flange is pushed into the slots of the lens housing) C. The lens is pushed out but the bayonet lock is not closed (the flange is on top of the lens housing slots)
The difference in the installation on the bayonet in the normal and "unattended" state (the lens is pushed out, but not in the grooves, but remained behind i.e. higher - closer to the film, the bayonet lock) = 1.3 mm
The flange focal distance is the distance from the mounting flange (the metal ring on the camera and the rear of the lens) to the film plane.
In «Industar-22» this is 28.8 mm
29516740307_ccbf47d4d4_o.png
and the full focus from mark "1 м" to mark "infinity – оо" is 2.5 мм
43737173234_c45a15f0e0_o.jpg
Setting at a min distance of 1 m Max distance infinity – “оо”
i.e. "non-advancement" with incorrect installation of the bayonet lock is equal to more than half of the entire focus scale, which means that even if the distance scale of this lens was set to "infinity", in fact, the setting was approximately "2 m"
And it is possible that (in addition, or even simply without it), the distance mark was set to "minimum", for example, to "1 m".
And to the main objects of shooting was a greater distance.
29516739407_01cda79509_o.png
The pointer of the distance scale is set to 1 m
All this suggests that the defocusing was large enough, but not so that the lens would not be fully extended.
In that case, the distance to the film would be about 9-11 mm, which is 6.8 ... 7.6 times the full-scale of the focus, which would give the image of the «ring».
Hence, one can conclude that even when the aperture is closed to 8 ... 11, the depth of the Sharply Imaginary Space (FLIP) can be very small when setting the sharpness to around 1 m, i.e. the extreme left position (corresponding to the maximally extended position).
Or, which is the same thing - not fully put forward (not put on bayonet fixation).
The lens is of the same type as «Industar-22».
More accurate data can be obtained if we calculate the Depth-of-Field for the «Industar-22» lens and the apertures at the level 1: 5,6 ... 1: 8 (and near this range).
DOF tables for the «Industar-22» lens for the entire range of apertures and basic points of focusing are shown below.
30585441368_ff269b3123_o.jpg
Depth-of-Field for lenses with focal length = 50 mm (for example, «Industar-22») for apertures from 1:2 to 1:6.3 The frame marks the intervals from the minimum distance to "infinity" for each aperture value
 
43737172754_c2d9dabca8_o.jpg
Depth-of-Field for lenses with a focal length = 50 mm (for example, «Industar-22») for apertures from 1:8 to 1:22
The term "diaphragm" is equivalent to the concept of "relative lens opening", i.e. the ratio of the current light diameter of the diaphragm to the focal length of the lens. ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Диафрагма_объектива en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diaphragm_(optics)
All modern cameras have a so-called "iris diaphragm".
Object №4
A thin strip in the form of a bend, reminiscent of the "hill" of Holatchahl, like the conspirologists like to call it, is a hair attached during storage.
It is an accidental artifact that appeared on film for many years of its movements, inspections and repackaging, which is stored in the archive of the Memorial Fund of the Dyatlov group, it is no longer there, he just stuck in the period before scanning, and then fell off.
Object №5
The rest of the film available on the modern frame is the defects of the film when it is used and stored.
The film was stored rolled up, then there is an increased danger of getting these scratches.
As far as I know, having been engaged in photography for more than 50 years (most of which are chemical photography), these are scratches when the film is twisted and stored.
Complicated by the appearance of microscopic crystals of chemical substances from time and temperature from dried photographic solutions (the smallest sharp objects, completely damaged the emulsion), which processed the film.
Well, maybe there is dust as an additional "formative".
These are so common defects that few of the qualified photographers pay attention to them on the 10th (not to mention the 50th) year of storage of films.
Moreover, these films were not stored "in science" - cut into six frames and placed in a sink, but simply rolled up and wrapped in paper ...
Object №6
This is a region of whitish exposition, in brightness less than object No. 3 and "covering" almost a half-frame - as noted above.
This is a manifestation of the fact that the lens of the lens dropped condensate when introduced from the frost into heat.
Even if the lens was rubbed, traces of this condensate still had to remain.
They gave this effect. And as it was mentioned above, on most of the images on the Internet, it was removed by means of electronic image processing (again, for example, increasing the contrast), considering it irrelevant to what was actually the case.

When was this frame shot

 

1. The shot was probably made by chance, and after all the events on 01-02.II.1959.
It is clear that it was made after Dyatlov group passed the Boot Rock, 1 km before the last place they pitched their tent. +/- 100 ... 200 m from this stone.
This is indicated by 2 previous pictures.
29516740547_dde5dfb0e0_o.jpg
43737173404_bd742c77d7_o.jpg
2. Most likely the shot is taken in the tent of rescuers between 26 ... February 27 (when the camera was brought to the searchers camp) and the day when it was sent to Ivdel with someone from the investigators, for example, L. N. Ivanov or V. I. Tempalov.
It is necessary to check when there was good sunny weather at this time, and it was quite cold.
Although these two states are compatible and completely natural for the winter conditions of February-March 1959 But the cut-off time i.e. when it could no longer be made, is very vague: it can be any time before the development of the film begins.
Even more precisely, before the film was rewound back, onto the feeding cassette.
And this could be in the searchers camp in the interval from February 26 ... 27 until March, when investigators took off with the evidence.
The next place where the camera could have been handled and there could be conditions for shooting such a frame is a small building on Ivdel airfield, where all things were brought and sorted, or other manipulations took place.
After that, the film must have been developed.
And after that, in urban conditions, it was very difficult to find a set of similar conditions.
3. The least likely it was in the morgue where the autopsy was done.
Why did I bring the last possible place?
Yes, because there is a film from the archive of L. N. Ivanov, where only the bodies in the morgue have been removed, and there is the very first frame that looks like this:
43737172994_7e36096f6b_o.jpg
The very first picture on the film of the investigation, filmed in the morgue of the city of Ivdel, when there were bodies of the first four (five) in early March 1959
The very first picture on the film of the investigation, filmed in the morgue of the city of Ivdel, when there were bodies of the first four (five) in early March 1959.
This first frame on the film photographers who provided the investigation (where all the pictures are taken exclusively in the morgue), is very similar to that last one.
By the general style, layout, shooting conditions and, most importantly, by a square bright silhouette, which very much resembles a window.
Such a combination in marching conditions is almost impossible to obtain.
The fact that he is technical is clear on all the criteria of photography: the very first, very close to the charging end, is shot at random, i.e. not caring about anything, etc.
This film has nothing to do with Dyatlov group cameras, it was shot after the bodies were taken to the morgue.
However, on this very first frame from this film there is an image that is somewhat reminiscent of what is on the "last frame" from G. Krivonischenko's film.
Apparently the shooting conditions were very similar.
In terms of the ratio of the darkness of the room and a bright fragment of a similar shape.
There is no overlap between the two photos, of course, but one can find similarities.
Once again I want to note: On this film there is nothing else but the corpses of the deceased in the morgue.
But all artifacts (a bright spot, not quite a round shape, an object in the form of a cloud of translucent consistency) are present. In any case, it has something similar ...
Most likely, an out of focus window gleams light on the walls in the dark room of the morgue.
And the frame is also "technical", i.e. made only to ensure that the film is guaranteed to be held in the camera further than the exposed charging end.
This is what photographers usually do.
Some people do this with a lid on the lens (but then there won't be any image at all), and some do it without a lid on the lens and then all that is captured in the shot is by chance, like in the photo above.

Where was the photo taken

 

"The scenery" in the photograph in question can be explained by the fact that it was shot in a room limited in size, in which there were no uniformly colored light surfaces, and some darker objects were closely located, behind a dense surface, not an open space.
1. The most likely place can be a tent of a search group in their camp on the river Auspiya.
The next photo shows the part of the door of the tent.
29516740197_189cb78f4e_o.jpg
The entrance to the tent of the search party in their camp at Auspiya, which was there between late February and late April 1959, is itself visible behind the bend figure in front of Igor Nevolin (facing us)
We can point to a number of key coincidences that can add to this assumption.
The entrance to the tent was set (direction of shooting, as well as the direction of the solar exposition) - almost strictly to the south, that's exactly the tent of rescuers in the clearing.
This information I received from V.G. Karelin back in February 2009.
And then everything coincided when I reconnaissance the location of this camp on the spot.
The fact that this is the meadow is not to be doubted.
On it, we found a large number of flat-cell batteries for a tube radio station, in August 2009.
And the orientation of the tent can also be just to the south, because in a different position, it will be quite inconvenient to place.
There they go, so differently, either the people will roll down one of the parties, or sleep "upside down", which again, it's completely inconvenient.
This same position gives the opportunity to catch a direct ray of the sun, with the appropriate weather.
2. I do not know what happened in the small building at the airfield, but it is possible that the same conditions have occurred there, purely theoretically.
3. As for the possibility of obtaining such a picture in the morgue, to what I have already said above, one can add that it is almost impossible to get there a ray that will give the image of the diaphragm. Although, judging by the frame from there a number of conditions for obtaining it are available.
Now we must point out that it is unlikely that this photo was taken directly in Dyatlov tent during all events that occurred on February 1 or 2, 1959.
  • In their tent there is no such space in which such a picture could be made. The tent was installed very low. The tent must have a height of no more than 130 ... 140 cm, which follows from the description when it was found on February 26, 1959 and the study on February 28, 1959. Ski poles had such a maximum height at that time. In addition, the entrance to the tent could not be rectangular, close to the square.
  • In those weather conditions that have been identified by the two penultimate shots - cloudy weather, limited visibility, lack of sunshine, dusk - the amount of this is not enough conditions for it to be obtained.
Let's consider the reasons why the picture could be made by chance.
  • There may be many reasons for accidental pressing of the camera button in the above described conditions, it is impossible to list everything.
  • But there is one natural instance of the shutter release. After the end of the film, it should be rolled back onto the cassette, before being removed, not "lighted", from the camera. To do this, first press the "release" button, then move to the rewind position a special lever and rewind with a special pen. In older devices, such as Dyatlov group camera «Zorki», when reinstalling the rewind lever, without this rewind the film it was impossible. If the bolt was cocked, but the button was not pressed, then it automatically descended. What kind of excerpt is this ...? And who knows ..? Most likely, it was installed before that.
43737172904_f75f58b9ce_o.jpg
The upper part of the camera is «Zorki». A red circle indicates the film rewind lever
I suspect that many connoisseurs of photography who can prove with all the calculations and calculations, as well as trumpeting their own authority, will argue that this is not usually done, especially by professionals.
Justification is simple: so, they say, the constantly cocked shutter stretches the spring of the timekeeping mechanism.
I can say with the same certainty that in all the campaigns, especially the winter ones, I have never done this.
Because the risk of losing an interesting shot was much more important than losing a few frames of the spent film.
By the way, so did many experienced tourists who were engaged in photography in campaigns at a fairly high level: A. Makletsov, A. Kolesnikov, B. Ogorodnikov, V. Shimanovskiy are only those tourists-skiers, MSU of the USSR, with whom I discussed questions photography in the ski hikes.
In fact, everything could be and even easier.
Someone from the search engines or investigators decided to just check whether the camera (camera mechanism) is in working order or not. He opened the case, cocked the bolt and pressed the trigger.
Or, someone from them just pressed "descent", that would rewind the tape back on the tape.
And these, mentioned randomnesses can be one more proof of that in this case it is a usual technical or unsuccessful random shot, which does not carry any meaning and/or mystery.
 
 

 DYATLOVPASS.COM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovmania/




#19674 Jean-Michel Jarre - aktualności

Napisano przez fortyck w 03 wrzesień 2018 - 21:06 w Jean-Michel Jarre

#europeforcreators

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Żródło: https://www.facebook...eanmicheljarre/




#19680 Jean-Michel Jarre - aktualności

Napisano przez fortyck w 04 wrzesień 2018 - 19:18 w Jean-Michel Jarre

As you might know by now sound quality is a little obsession of mine.

 

I remember well working on re-working AERO at the time.

 

For Planet Jarre we did a few tracks in 5.1.

 

They are part of the Vinyl and Boxset.

 

Hope you’ll enjoy them

 

43567024635_50a9c4a44b_o.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Żródło: https://www.facebook...eanmicheljarre/




#19684 50 years of music

Napisano przez fortyck w 05 wrzesień 2018 - 19:33 w Video

50 years of music - 1981 (cz. 4)

 

 

On September 14th 2018 Jean-Michel Jarre releases his ultimate Best Of PLANET JARRE - 50 YEARS OF MUSIC.

 

This #JMJSeries will lead you through Jean-Michel Jarre's special moments of the past 50 years.

 

This episode covers the very special trip to China in 1981 where Jean-Michel Jarre was invited to perform as the first western musician in 30 years.

 

 

 

Jean-Michel Jarre “Planet Jarre – 50 Years Of Music”: https://lnk.to/JMJ-PlanetJarre

 

Jean-Michel Jarre - Subscribe here: http://www.youtube.c...er/jeanmiche...

 

More from Jean-Michel Jarre: Oxygene, Pt. 4: https://youtu.be/kSIMVnPA994

 

Choose your music service to listen to Jean-Michel Jarre: https://jean-michel-jarre.lnk.to/JMJ

 

 

Follow Jean-Michel Jarre:

 

Website: https://jeanmicheljarre.com/

Facebook: https://www.facebook...jeanmicheljarre

Twitter: https://twitter.com/jeanmicheljarre

Instagram: https://www.instagra.../jeanmichelj...




#19688 Tragedia na Przełęczy Diatłowa (1/2 luty 1959 r.)

Napisano przez fortyck w 06 wrzesień 2018 - 19:39 w Ogólne

Twilight Sleep - Unrest

 

 

 

 

Unrest in the streets

Unrest in your mind

Unrest in the constellations

We were always the restless kind

 

Unrest this restless heart

With stellar circuitry

There are no accidents

There are no friendly fires

 

So pull out all the wires

 

Unrest this restless heart

With stellar circuitry

The nights are getting longer

The days are getting colder

Remember when you told her

The time for growing older

Was not tonight or ever

So hush the signifier

 

And pull out all the wires

Pull out all the wires

Pull out all the wires

 

Disobey the future whispers only

Harm the ones

Who listen

We can stop the oxidation

Disobey the future whispers

Only harm the ones who listen

We can stop the oxidation

 

One task to remove the lines

Another to erase the signs

So many ways to kill the time

We have to kill the time

 

And pull out all the wires

Pull out all the wires

Pull out all the wires

 

Electric currents plan to

Outsmart mother nature

 

Disobey the future whispers only

Harm the ones

Who listen

We can stop the oxidation

Disobey the future whispers

Only harm the ones who listen

We can stop the oxidation




#19699 Jean-Michel Jarre - aktualności

Napisano przez fortyck w 07 wrzesień 2018 - 19:26 w Jean-Michel Jarre

Today is the final pre-release of one of the Planet Jarre tracks before the full album is out next Friday.

 

AOR is a mysterious title and you can listen to the full story in the AOR (Behind the track) in your preferred platform

 

 

https://forms.sonymu...mj-pj-playlist/

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Żródło: https://www.facebook...eanmicheljarre/




#19704 Tragedia na Przełęczy Diatłowa (1/2 luty 1959 r.)

Napisano przez fortyck w 09 wrzesień 2018 - 19:12 w Ogólne

43859707424_0418aa8cc5_o.jpg




#19709 Jean-Michel Jarre - aktualności

Napisano przez fortyck w 10 wrzesień 2018 - 19:25 w Jean-Michel Jarre

Only 4 days left....when I was asked to work on a Best Of it was a strange task at first.

 

I never listen to my previous music usually of course.

 

So I decided to approach this project differently and devide my catalog in four different categories.

 

And all the sudden it became interesting for me to select titles and arrange them in a way they could work as a playlist.

 

So in this Best Of is a lot of work.

 

I hope you will enjoy it and maybe like myself discover some songs that you might not have listened to in a long time.

 

#PlanetJarre not much time left to pre-order https://lnk.to/JMJ-PlanetJarre

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Żródło: https://www.facebook...eanmicheljarre/




#19715 Jean-Michel Jarre - aktualności

Napisano przez fortyck w 11 wrzesień 2018 - 19:36 w Jean-Michel Jarre

Celebrating 50 years of music, 41 tracks and 2 brand new songs.

 

Only 3 days to go until the release of Planet Jarre - have you pre-ordered your copy? 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Żródło: https://www.facebook...eanmicheljarre/




#19718 50 years of music

Napisano przez fortyck w 12 wrzesień 2018 - 11:54 w Video

50 years of music - 1983 (cz. 5)

 

 

On September 14th 2018 Jean-Michel Jarre releases his ultimate Best Of PLANET JARRE - 50 YEARS OF MUSIC.

 

This #JMJSeries will lead you through Jean-Michel Jarre's special moments of the past 50 years.

 

This episode covers the very special story about the album Music for Supermarkets as well as the album Zoolook including vocals in Jean-Michel Jarre's production for the first time.

 

 

 

Jean-Michel Jarre “Planet Jarre – 50 Years Of Music”: https://lnk.to/JMJ-PlanetJarre

 

Jean-Michel Jarre - Subscribe here: http://www.youtube.c...er/jeanmiche...

 

More from Jean-Michel Jarre: Oxygene, Pt. 4: https://youtu.be/kSIMVnPA994

 

Choose your music service to listen to Jean-Michel Jarre: https://jean-michel-jarre.lnk.to/JMJ

 

 

Follow Jean-Michel Jarre:

 

Website: https://jeanmicheljarre.com/

Facebook: https://www.facebook...jeanmicheljarre

Twitter: https://twitter.com/jeanmicheljarre

Instagram: https://www.instagra.../jeanmichelj...




#19719 Jean-Michel Jarre - aktualności

Napisano przez fortyck w 12 wrzesień 2018 - 12:18 w Jean-Michel Jarre

14 września 2018 r. pojawią się w sprzedaży reedycje kolejnych starszych albumów JMJ: 

Metamorphoses, Geometry of Love, Oxygene 7-13

 

Przednie okładki już wiadomo jakie są, a tylne?

 

Oto one:

 

30765303568_265267ddff_o.jpg

 

44585294662_ba4cca057e_o.jpg

 

44585295052_4e7413c899_o.jpg




#19720 Jean-Michel Jarre - aktualności

Napisano przez fortyck w 12 wrzesień 2018 - 12:36 w Jean-Michel Jarre

14 września 2018 r. będzie miała miejsce premiera nowego albumu JMJ (z okazji 50-lecia działalności):

Planet Jarre

 

A oto tylna okładka:

 

43916554724_97110dfc71_o.jpg




#19724 Tragedia na Przełęczy Diatłowa (1/2 luty 1959 r.)

Napisano przez fortyck w 12 wrzesień 2018 - 19:33 w Ogólne

43733142225_4d760b099a_o.jpg




#19725 Jean-Michel Jarre - aktualności

Napisano przez fortyck w 12 wrzesień 2018 - 19:33 w Jean-Michel Jarre

Interview with @maxdax @planetariumhamburg / live in instagram story #50yearsofmusic #jmjmoments #planetjarre

 

44642172421_24619c2c14_o.jpg




#19726 Jean-Michel Jarre - aktualności

Napisano przez fortyck w 12 wrzesień 2018 - 19:36 w Jean-Michel Jarre

#planetjarre out Sept. 14th everywhere

 

29704069797_51ab71db8a_o.jpg




#19727 Uniwersum Metro 2035 - aktualności

Napisano przez fortyck w 12 wrzesień 2018 - 19:48 w Dmitry Glukhovsky

Druga książka z serii Uniwersum Metro 2035

już 3 pażdziernika 2018 r. !

 

29704259797_bd8cc7a202_o.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Żródło: https://www.olesiejuk.pl/…/209905-uniwersum-metro-2035-czer…




#19731 Jean-Michel Jarre - aktualności

Napisano przez fortyck w 13 wrzesień 2018 - 21:06 w Jean-Michel Jarre

This album is divided into four different parts to represent the four different worlds that make up my own world… my own planet.

 

And I hope that you will enjoy the journey.

 

Who’s ready for the release of Planet Jarre tomorrow? 

 

http://smarturl.it/JMJ_EssentialsPIV

 

44613950532_24154026da_o.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Żródło: https://www.facebook...eanmicheljarre/




#19732 Jean-Michel Jarre - aktualności

Napisano przez fortyck w 13 wrzesień 2018 - 21:17 w Jean-Michel Jarre

EQUINOXE INFINITY, LE NOUVEL ALBUM DE JARRE SORT LE 16 NOVEMBRE 2018

 

12 SEPTEMBRE 2018

 

Rédigé par Jeanbatman et publié depuis Overblog

 

ob_0c6ef8_equinoxe-infinity.jpg

 

Jean-Michel Jarre a annoncé à Hambourg aujourd'hui en marge de la première de sa compilation Planet Jarre la sortie pour le 16 novembre 2018 d'un nouvel album studio sur le thème de l'intelligence artificielle, 

 

Equinoxe Infinity, qui se compose de 10 mouvements qui s'enchaînent.

 

 

Track-list

 

  1. The Watchers (movement 1)
  2. Flying totems (movement 2)
  3. Robots don’t cry (movement 3)
  4. All that you leave behind (movement 4)
  5. If the wind could speak (movement 5)
  6. Infinity (movement 6)
  7. Machines are learning (movement 7)
  8. The opening (movement 8)
  9. Don’t look back (movement 9)
  10. Equinoxe infinity (movement 10)

 

Ce nouvel album ne se veut pas une suite d'Equinoxe, l'album culte de 1978, mais plutôt une rêverie autour des personnages de sa couverture, "les Watchers".

 

Au cours de son allocution en Allemagne,

 

Jean-Michel Jarre a décrit cet album comme un "Equinoxe aux stéroïdes".

 

Particularité de cet album, il aura deux pochettes, une version "optimiste" où hommes et machines auront cohabités dans la nature (en tête d'article), et une plus apocalyptique (ci-dessous).

 

ob_b606a9_equinoxe-infinity-rouge-600x60

Plus d'informations à venir...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Żródło: http://www.jarre-liv...embre-2018.html