Tragedia na Przełęczy Diatłowa (1 luty 1959 r.)

[fortyck]

This is a transcript of the diary from the case files that was originally thought to be Kolmogorova's but it is not know to this day who does it belong to.

 

The last entry is from January 30.

 

The last paragraph says "𝘛𝘰𝘥𝘢𝘺 𝘪𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘣𝘪𝘳𝘵𝘩𝘥𝘢𝘺 𝘰𝘧 𝘚𝘢𝘴𝘩𝘢 𝘒𝘰𝘭𝘦𝘷𝘢𝘵𝘰𝘷.

 

𝘊𝘰𝘯𝘨𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘶𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴.

 

𝘞𝘦 𝘨𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘩𝘪𝘮 𝘢 𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘨𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦, 𝘸𝘩𝘪𝘤𝘩 𝘩𝘦 𝘪𝘮𝘮𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘭𝘺 𝘥𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘰 8 𝘱𝘪𝘦𝘤𝘦𝘴 (𝘓𝘺𝘶𝘥𝘢 𝘸𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘥𝘪𝘥 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘶𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘭 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘦𝘯𝘥 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘯𝘦𝘳).

 

𝘚𝘰 𝘢𝘯𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘥𝘢𝘺 𝘰𝘧 𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘵𝘳𝘦𝘬 𝘸𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘸𝘦𝘭𝘭.”

 

 

Aleksander Kolevatov is born on November 16th.

 

What's up with this then?

 

https://dyatlovpass.com/unknown-diary

 

 

I haven't come across a satisfactory explanation for this entry.

 

But I have read crazy ones.

 

Here is one that takes the prize, read further.

 

Since this is not the only mistake in this diary and it is believed it was found in Dyatlov's field bag, why is he carrying it if it belongs to someone else?

 

And this is not the only mistake in this diary, the train number doesn't exist.

 

The Dyatlov group took train №45, not №43.

 

There is a theory that there is another Dyatlov group in a parallel dimension where things happen slightly differently, you know.

 

Everyone knows that, right?

 

At some point, the dimensions overlap or cross, and bad things happen.

 

Something that came and went back into the other dimension could have killed them and dropped the wrong diary in the process.

 

https://dyatlovpass.com/unknown-diary

https://dyatlovpass.com/unknown-diary

 

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

[fortyck]

My tribute to the Dyatlov group, I always bring them tangerines instead of flowers.

 

2019

2022

2022

2019

2022

2019

2019

2022

2022

 

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

[fortyck]

Photo by Yuri Krivonischenko.

 

In the foreground, without a backpack, stands Igor Dyatlov and looks somewhere to the left of the photographer.

 

His left knee in the snow, obviously Igor was kneeling when he took off his backpack.

 

From the left, behind Igor, is Nikolay Thibeaux-Brignolle, he took off his ski boot and looked at the photographer.

 

Resisting the force of the wind, Igor and Nikolay inclined their bodies forward.

 

In the background is Lyuda Dubinina, she turns away from the wind and looks around, looks at the one who follows her.

 

She has a small backpack on her back.

 

The presence of a small backpack on the back of Lyuda Dubinina.

 

She had a leg wound, so the guys tried to make the weight of her backpack as easy as possible.

 

Behind her another figure is visible, most likely it's Aleksander Kolevatov.

 

The group came to the foot of the pass and stopped at the edge of the forest.

 

Around the small crooked birches and spruce.

 

The weather is very different from what it was in the valley of the Auspiya river.

 

On the pass there is a strong wind, blizzard, low visibility is bad at 100 - 200 m.

 

"...𝘞𝘦 𝘨𝘳𝘢𝘥𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘈𝘶𝘴𝘱𝘪𝘺𝘢 𝘷𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘦𝘺, 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘦 𝘪𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘶𝘰𝘶𝘴, 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘲𝘶𝘪𝘵𝘦 𝘴𝘮𝘰𝘰𝘵𝘩.

 

𝘍𝘪𝘳 𝘵𝘳𝘦𝘦𝘴 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘳𝘦𝘱𝘭𝘢𝘤𝘦𝘥 𝘣𝘺 𝘸𝘪𝘴𝘱𝘺 𝘣𝘪𝘳𝘤𝘩-𝘸𝘰𝘰𝘥.

 

𝘞𝘦 𝘤𝘢𝘮𝘦 𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘵𝘳𝘦𝘦 𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘦.

 

𝘞𝘪𝘯𝘥 𝘪𝘴 𝘸𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘯, 𝘸𝘢𝘳𝘮, 𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨.

 

𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘦𝘥 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘸𝘪𝘯𝘥 𝘪𝘴 𝘴𝘪𝘮𝘪𝘭𝘢𝘳 𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘢𝘪𝘳 𝘥𝘳𝘢𝘧𝘵 𝘤𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘣𝘺 𝘢 𝘵𝘢𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘰𝘧𝘧 𝘢𝘪𝘳𝘱𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘦.

 

𝘍𝘪𝘳𝘯, 𝘰𝘱𝘦𝘯 𝘴𝘱𝘢𝘤𝘦𝘴.

 

𝘐 𝘤𝘢𝘯'𝘵 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘯 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘰𝘧 𝘴𝘦𝘵𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘶𝘱 𝘢 𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘢𝘨𝘦.

 

𝘐𝘵'𝘴 𝘤𝘭𝘰𝘴𝘦 𝘵𝘰 4."

 

 

https://dyatlovpass.com/diaries#31jan

 

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

[fortyck]

On the morning of January 31, a new conflict erupted as Nikolay refused to stay on duty and Zina and Rustem, who had to take over, accidentally burnt Krivonischenko's mittens and sweatshirt.

 

He went into a fit and started screaming and swearing at them, but the group still managed to start relatively early, at about 10 am.

 

They were moving along the Mansi ski trail, which would frequently disappear, forcing them to feel their way forward.

 

Dyatlov wrote in the group’s diary: “𝘞𝘢𝘭𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘴 𝘦𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘥 𝘵𝘰𝘥𝘢𝘺.

 

𝘞𝘦 𝘤𝘢𝘯'𝘵 𝘴𝘦𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘪𝘭, 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘨𝘳𝘰𝘱𝘦 𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘸𝘢𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘨𝘩 𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘦𝘴.

 

𝘊𝘢𝘯’𝘵 𝘥𝘰 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘯 1.52 𝘬𝘮 (1 𝘮𝘪𝘭𝘦) 𝘱𝘦𝘳 𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘳.

 

𝘛𝘳𝘺𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘯𝘦𝘸 𝘸𝘢𝘺𝘴 𝘵𝘰 𝘤𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘢𝘵𝘩.

 

𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘧𝘪𝘳𝘴𝘵 𝘪𝘯 𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘦 𝘥𝘳𝘰𝘱𝘴 𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘣𝘢𝘤𝘬𝘱𝘢𝘤𝘬, 𝘴𝘬𝘪𝘴 𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘸𝘢𝘳𝘥 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘧𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘶𝘵𝘦𝘴, 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘴 𝘣𝘢𝘤𝘬 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘢 10-15 𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘶𝘵𝘦 𝘣𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘬, 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘤𝘢𝘵𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘴 𝘶𝘱 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘨𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘱.

 

𝘛𝘩𝘢𝘵’𝘴 𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘸𝘢𝘺 𝘵𝘰 𝘬𝘦𝘦𝘱 𝘭𝘢𝘺𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘴𝘬𝘪 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘬𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘯-𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘱.

 

𝘏𝘢𝘳𝘥 𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘦𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘥 𝘩𝘪𝘬𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘨𝘩, 𝘸𝘩𝘰 𝘩𝘢𝘴 𝘵𝘰 𝘧𝘰𝘭𝘭𝘰𝘸 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘯𝘦𝘸 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘪𝘭 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘧𝘶𝘭𝘭 𝘨𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘰𝘯 𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘣𝘢𝘤𝘬.”

 

 

Gradually, the group was moving away from the Auspiya river:

 

“𝘞𝘦 𝘨𝘳𝘢𝘥𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘈𝘶𝘴𝘱𝘪𝘺𝘢 𝘷𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘦𝘺, 𝘪𝘵’𝘴 𝘶𝘱𝘸𝘢𝘳𝘥𝘴 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘸𝘢𝘺 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘨𝘰𝘦𝘴 𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘴𝘮𝘰𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘭𝘺.

 

𝘛𝘩𝘪𝘯 𝘣𝘪𝘳𝘤𝘩 𝘨𝘳𝘰𝘷𝘦 𝘳𝘦𝘱𝘭𝘢𝘤𝘦𝘴 𝘧𝘪𝘳𝘴.

 

𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘦𝘯𝘥 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘵 𝘪𝘴 𝘨𝘦𝘵𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘤𝘭𝘰𝘴𝘦𝘳.”

 

Judging by Zina’s wording in her diary “𝘛𝘰𝘥𝘢𝘺, 𝘸𝘦’𝘭𝘭 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘣𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘺 𝘣𝘦 𝘣𝘶𝘪𝘭𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢 𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘢𝘨𝘦”, the group had discussed laying down a cache site before the radial ascent towards Mt. Otorten.

 

That was not a spontaneous decision.

 

During the planning stage of the route, Dyatlov had realized that a cache site in the upper reaches of the Auspiya River should make going to Otorten with lighter backpacks easier, and had discussed the idea with Sergey Sogrin.

 

The site was intended to be above the forest line but, as it turned out, that was not to be:

 

“𝘞𝘪𝘯𝘥 𝘪𝘴 𝘸𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘯, 𝘸𝘢𝘳𝘮, 𝘱𝘪𝘦𝘳𝘤𝘪𝘯𝘨, 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘦𝘥 𝘭𝘪𝘬𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘥𝘳𝘢𝘧𝘵 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘢𝘪𝘳𝘱𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘦𝘴 𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘢𝘬𝘦𝘰𝘧𝘧.

 

𝘍𝘪𝘳𝘯, 𝘰𝘱𝘦𝘯 𝘴𝘱𝘢𝘤𝘦𝘴. 𝘐 𝘤𝘢𝘯’𝘵 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘬 𝘰𝘧 𝘴𝘦𝘵𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘶𝘱 𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘢𝘨𝘦 𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦.”

 

By that time, it was already around 4 pm, and the group had no choice but to return to the valley of the Auspiya River.

 

Dyatlov wrote down:

“𝘞𝘦’𝘳𝘦 𝘦𝘹𝘩𝘢𝘶𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘥, 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘵 𝘴𝘦𝘵𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘶𝘱 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘯𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵.

 

𝘍𝘪𝘳𝘦𝘸𝘰𝘰𝘥 𝘪𝘴 𝘴𝘤𝘢𝘳𝘤𝘦, 𝘮𝘰𝘴𝘵𝘭𝘺 𝘥𝘢𝘮𝘱 𝘧𝘪𝘳𝘴.

 

𝘞𝘦 𝘣𝘶𝘪𝘭𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘢𝘮𝘱𝘧𝘪𝘳𝘦 𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘭𝘰𝘨𝘴, 𝘵𝘰𝘰 𝘵𝘪𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘪𝘨 𝘢 𝘧𝘪𝘳𝘦 𝘱𝘪𝘵.

 

𝘋𝘪𝘯𝘯𝘦𝘳’𝘴 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘵.”

 

 

We can only speculate about what happened next.

 

By the evening of January 31, the group was slightly behind schedule: they were supposed to cross over into the valley of the Lozva River that day, but the elements forced them to stay in the valley of the Auspiya.

 

Did they intend to make up for that lag and make changes to the trek route?

 

Could it be they didn’t see the situation as critical?

 

Were they planning to get into higher gear or to continue at their usual pace?

 

See all diary entries and photos from January 31, 1959 →

https://dyatlovpass.com/diaries#31jan

... and make sure to scroll down, there is more information under the gallery.

 

Krivonischenko, Dubinina (back), Doroshenko and Kolmogorova (front), loose photo (no film)

Sunny weather. Next to Zolotaryov are two trees, the second one has Mansi markings. loose photo (no film)

In the photo is Rustem Slobodin, on his shoulders there is a backpack with a pair of felt boots, a handle of an ax sticks out from the backpack. loose photo (no film)

After lunch, the group heads to the pass. Bad weather, strong wind, blizzard, visibility is limited. In the photo, most likely is Zina Kolmogorova. loose photo (no film)

Igor Dyatlov (front), Nikolay Thibeaux-Brignolle (left), Lyuda Dubinina (right). Strong head wind, hikers are above tree line. Krivonischenko's camera film №1 frame №27

Dyatlov, Kolevatov, Zolotoryov, Doroshenko, Slobodin helping Kolmogorova with her backpack, Dubinina with back, Nikolay Thibeaux-Brignolle, Krivonischenko's camera film №1 frame №28

 

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

[fortyck]

Dyatlov Pass today

 

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

[fortyck]

𝙊𝙉 𝙏𝙃𝙀𝙄𝙍 𝙒𝘼𝙔 𝙏𝙊 𝙏𝙃𝙀 𝘿𝙔𝘼𝙏𝙇𝙊𝙑 𝙋𝘼𝙎𝙎

 

This group left Ivdel today on their journey to the Dyatlov Pass.

 

The last two photos are from 2022, they will camp on the same place in the same tent.

 

 

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

[fortyck]

What happened on the night of February 1, 1959 is haunting us till this day.

https://dyatlovpass.com/diaries#1feb

 

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

[fortyck]

The only thing we know is that on February 1, the group set off from the valley of the Auspiya towards a pass which at that time had no name, but would later come to bear that of their group.

 

They were not to write down anything further in their diaries, nor would they ever be heard from again.

 

Read more about February 1, 1959 → https://dyatlovpass.com/diaries#1feb

 

Doroshenko, Kolmogorova (bent down), Zolotaryov, Dubinina and Krivonischenko holding a bucket rather than dusting the stove. loose photo (no film)

Aleksander Kolevatov and Nikolay Thibeaux-Brignolle laughing at something, possibly the burnt Krivonischenko's jacket that Kolevatov is pointing at. Krivonischneko's camera film №1 frame №29

Just for laughs - Slobodin posing with Krivonischenko's burnt quilted jacket. Krivonischneko's camera film №1 frame №30

Morning, Rustem Slobodin posing for a photo in Krivonischenko's burnt quilted jacket. Krivonischneko's camera film №1 frame №31

Dyatlov's group on February 1st on their way to Kholat Syakhl. Krivonischneko's camera film №1 frame №32

Dyatlov's group on February 1st on their way to Kholat Syakhl. Krivonischneko's camera film №1 frame №33
I believe this is the true last photo of the Dyatlov group

Dyatlov group allegedly preparing the tent for their last night alive, photo is allegedly taken around 3 pm on February 1. loose photo (no film)

Dyatlov group allegedly preparing the tent for their last night alive, photo is taken allegedly around 3 pm on February 1. loose photo (no film)

This is a technological shot made in the photo lab before the film was taken out of the camera. Krivonischneko's camera film №1 frame №34

 

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

[fortyck]

They had to prepare a note for the ascent to Mt Otorten, but instead they write 𝗘𝗩𝗘𝗡𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗢𝗧𝗢𝗥𝗧𝗘𝗡 №𝟭, a satirical propaganda leaflet.

 

The original Evening Otorten is unknown.

 

Only a typewritten copy remained in the criminal case file.

 

We are showing th enote that was found on Otorten from the previous group that has been there.

 

If the Dyatlov grouop would have ascended to Mt Otorten they should have replaced the note with their own and mail this one following the instructions.

 

Note from 1956 (collected by the Akselrod group from Otorten on Feb 27, 1959) https://dyatlovpass.com/case-files-volume-2-66

Note from 1956 (collected by the Akselrod group from Otorten on Feb 27, 1959) https://dyatlovpass.com/case-files-volume-2-66

Copy of hikers combat leaflet https://dyatlovpass.com/case-files-31

Copy of hikers combat leaflet https://dyatlovpass.com/case-files-31

[fortyck]

There is nothing new in this article. But Komsomolskaya Pravda chose to mention "1079" book in their article for the anniversary of the Dyatlov Pass incident

 

https://dyatlovpass.com/mysterious-flash?fbclid=IwAR2UD-JAvaNdGafrE4q62JHo3-93VR7AkQXpuQhjR8OmwkhQX4y2s_FR8kQ

 

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

[fortyck]

The annual conference in Yekaterinburg is now over.

 

See list of presenters on https://dyatlovpass.com/

 

 

I will post a link to the record of the event when it becomes available.

 

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

[fortyck]

Dyatlov Pass now

 

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

[fortyck]

Перевал Дятлова 64 года - Екатеринбург, 2 февраля 2023 г.

 

 

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

[fortyck]

Мъртвата планина или случаят „Дятлов”

 

 

Каква е истината за инцидента "Дятлов" от 1959 г.?

 

Какви са всички хипотези за необяснимата смърт на групата и има ли замесени ръководни кадри на тогавашната СССР?

 

Версията е на Теодора Хаджийска, водещ световен автор и разследващ.

[fortyck]

A very controversial article about the labaz as we know it.

 

I completely agree with all the discrepancies, I don't believe the Dyatlov group were "idiots" to make their labaz in the snow, and how did it survive undisturbed by animals for a month?

 

https://dyatlovpass.com/there-was-no-labaz

 

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

[fortyck]

LOCATION OF THE CACHE SITE (LABAZ) OF THE DYATLOV GROUP

25 January 2023. Ural Pathfinder. Author Aleksander

 Russian

To date, almost all significant places of the tragedy of 1959 associated with the death of nine hikers led by Igor Dyatlov in the mountains of the Northern Urals are known.

 

Until recently, it was not possible to find the labaz (this term was originally used by the hikers themselves, for example, in the diary of Zinaida Kolmogorova, and after that by the investigators and searchers) - the place of laying food by hikers before the ascent to Mt Otorten, as well as the place of their overnight stay from 31 January to February 1st.

 

During the search work, the labaz was found on March 2, 1959, a few hundred meters from the searchers camp along the maps drawn by the hikers themselves.

 

Here is how Yuri Yarovoy describes it in his fiction book based on documentary events: "Found the labaz of the Sosnov group.

 

The labaz was almost next to us, a little higher up Malik river.

 

In the middle of the clearing rose a snow pyramid topped with a pair of skis.

 

One could only wonder how this pyramid had not been noticed before - our ski track was ten meters away"

 

("The highest category of difficulty" 1966).

 

 

Pyotr Bartolomey, a participant in the search, recalls that the path from the search camp went north to the pass (in the interview he said higher from the camp, which corresponds to the northern direction on the diagram under the discussion), and the labaz was to the left of the path if you climb to the pass.

 

This is not contradicted by another searcher, Yuri Sahnin, who notes and adds that "There, one road rises, from the place where the camp was on Auspiya, there was their labaz somewhere nearby.

 

This the only reasonable place to go to the pass.

 

Everything else is through the thicket, through the forest, but here you quickly enough go out into the open space...

 

But on the pass - there was just a bald spot and we walked along the edge of the forest, and nowhere did we particularly cling to the trees.

 

In the protocol of the inspection of the storehouse from the criminal case, the exact distances are not indicated, but it is noted that "...

 

In the upper sources of Auspiya river, under the pass of the river Lozva found labaz (storage site) of Dyatlov group." (case files 8).

 

According to the report of the members of the route-qualification commission of the All-Union Tourism Section "The labaz was found only 300m from the base camp in the forest, 100m from the bank of Auspiya." (case files 38).

 

According to the testimony of Evgeniy Maslennikov "the upper reaches of Auspiya, 400m from the search base camp, was found the Dyatlov group labaz" (case files 220).

 

It is also known that this place was located 500m below the border of the forest and 1000m from the landing site (testimony of Evgeniy Maslennikov, case files 71 и case files 73).

 

In addition, the coordinates of its location were determined (radiogram dated March 2, 1959, case files 167), but they are lost or not found.

 

The surviving information about the location of the labaz did not allow modern researchers to find it on the ground for a long time.

 

Difficulties in finding the place were due to the lack of accurate data on the location of the searchers camp, as well as confusion in the name of the watercourses.

 

The searchers believed that their camp was located on Auspiya river, while it was located on a tributary of this river.

Scheme of the area of the tragic events of 1959 from the criminal case

The difficulties in finding the labaz arose due to changes in vegetation, since over the past more than half a century, the vegetation that is captured in the photographs of 1959 has changed due to the growth of trees, in addition, other changes could occur associated with the appearance of new tree and shrub vegetation or some part of the trees could die, for example, as a result of a wind or snowfall.

 

Some researchers, after unsuccessful attempts, came to the conclusion that it is "practically impossible to find the labaz, since there is not a sufficiently accurate amount of necessary information for this" (Borzenkov, 2019).

 

Despite conflicting and insufficient data, the location of the labaz was found on August 11, 2019 during the expedition of the foundation "In Memory of the Dyatlov Group" as follows.

 

The leader of the expedition, Yuri Kuntsevich, indicated the location of the winter camp of the searchers, which, in his opinion, was in the same clearing where the expeditions of the foundation are always based (according to Aleksander Alekseenkov, based on his own research in August 2022, the winter camp of the searchers was located a little further - 60m north-west of the clearing in question).

 

Taking this information as a starting point, the expedition member Aleksander Konstantinov examined two possible locations for the labaz, which are given by its location relative to the searchers camp (300m and 100m, as well as 400m and 100m).

 

In both cases, it was not possible to find the location of the labaz, but the forest conditions in the second place (400m and 100m) were very similar to those captured in the photographs of 1959, so the search area was increased.

The location of the labaz (yellow rectangle) on a medium-resolution satellite image. The red line is drawn through the clearing (blue circle), where the expeditions of the Dyatlov Group Dyatlov Foundation and the famous memorial remains are permanently based. Showing true north and south.

As a result, at a distance of 400m from the clearing, where the expeditions of the Dyatlov foundation are always based, and 160m from the nameless stream, the location of the labaz was found, which, despite the past 60 years, was quite well identified by characteristic trees and other signs.

 

The labaz has the following coordinates 61°44′48.1" North latitude and 59°26′58" East longitude (World Geodetic Reference System WGS-84).

The first modern photograph of the labaz (photographed by Aleksander Konstantinov, August 11, 2019). In the right part of the photo and in the background (behind the coniferous trees) there are gaps that have been preserved since 1959.

In August 2022, members of the expedition of the foundation "In Memory of the Dyatlov Group" conducted a survey of the labaz.

 

This survey found:

1. birch bark flooring,
2. four traces of partially felled and partially broken branches on a fir about 150 years old,
3. numerous breaks of branches on a neighboring fir that is over a hundred years old,
4. a small pile of dry branches under the same fir,
5. the remains of a log next to the flooring,
6. old codominant fir and spruce.

Codominant fir (right side of the photo) and spruce next to birch bark flooring (photo by Aleksander Alekseenkov, August 2022).

Could not find any metal objects or the location of the campfire of the group.

 

Birch bark flooring has an irregular shape 1.5m long and 1m wide...

Настил из березовой коры (его границы обозначены красной веревкой) после раскопки из под слоя дёрна толщиной 2-3 см (фотография А. В. Константинова, 3 августа 2022 г.)

... found directly at the place of laying the products (aka labaz).

The location of the birch bark flooring in a modern photograph and the labaz in a 1959 photograph (inset). The blue lines indicate the same trees, the red ovals indicate the location of the flooring in 2022 and the hikers labaz in 1959 (photo by Aleksander Konstantinov, August 3, 2022).

Mapping of trees was carried out, cores were taken from some trees, minimal environmental measures were taken (an information plate was placed on the tree and a path was marked for movement in the immediate vicinity of the labaz), photo and video filming was carried out.

An information plate placed at the labaz (photo by Teodora Hadjiyska, August 3, 2022).

The location of the labaz is identified by two characteristic birch trees, one of which died, but continues to stand in the form of a dead remains of a trunk 2.2m high.

 

Despite it has been 60 years, the birch trees are still recognizable by the characteristic bends of their trunks...

Fragments of photographs with characteristic birch trees in 1959 (inset) and in 2019 (background), characteristic curves are marked with red lines (modern photograph taken by Aleksander Konstantinov on August 11, 2019)

...the relative position of the vegetation surrounding them, the characteristic combination of open and forested areas and the terrain.

 

In addition to these two birches, old-growth two-peaked fir and spruce located south of the dead birch, two fir trees northeast of the old living birch (one of the characteristic birches mentioned above) and other trees have been preserved.

 

In the background of some photographs from 1959, there is a fairly open area, which to some extent has survived to this day.

 

In one of the photographs from 1959, taken by the hikers themselves (a photograph with Nikolay Thibeaux-Brignolle and Aleksander Kolevatov), a short gap is visible on the right side, behind which distant mountain slopes (the same photograph shows at least one of the surviving fir, mentioned above, northeast of the old living birch).

 

This gap can also be seen in modern photographs (the gap is located on the right side of the photo), but the distant mountains are not visible due to the grown trees and (or) due to the fact that the leaves of the trees interfere, however, the right slope of the river valley is located in that direction.

 

Auspiya, which is visible in a photograph taken by the hikers in 1959.

Mutual arrangement of individual characteristic bends of the trunks (blue lines) of adjacent birch trees nowadays and a photograph from the search (inset), as well as preserved codominant spruce (to the right in the photo) and fir (red arrows; modern photograph taken by Aleksander Konstantinov, August 11, 2019).

A flooring made of birch bark was found under a layer of turf 2-3 cm thick between two characteristic birch trees.

 

In addition to the main flooring measuring 1.5m x 1.0m, a small piece of birch bark about 20 cm x 20 cm in size was found next to it.

 

Possible doubts about the preservation of birch bark over such a long period of time can be dispelled by the following arguments.

 

Novgorod birch bark letters have survived to this day from the 11th-14th centuries, which indicates the possibility of preserving birch bark not only for decades, as in our case, but even for several centuries.

 

In addition, the labaz was found on the border of crooked forest and dark coniferous forest, where the duration of the growing season is relatively short, and, consequently, there is a relatively short period favorable for the processes of decay and decomposition of organic substances.

Remains of a birch trunk with peeling bark, 20 meters northwest of the labaz (photograph by Teodora Hadjiyskaya, August 3, 2022).

In the protocol of inspection of the labaz it was noted that food and other objects were lined with cardboard, however, Yuri Yudin, the tenth hiker who, due to illness, could not complete this trip, noted in 2012 that "... of course there could not be cardboard there, because it's too heavy."

 

Considering this, as well as the fact that birch bark is not mentioned in the inspection protocol, it can be quite reasonable to assume that there was a mistake made when drawing up the protocol, when the birch bark, for some reason, was written down as cardboard.

 

According to one of the authors of this article (Shamil Sabirov), the bark was torn off and put on the snow by searchers for counting and weighing products so that nothing was lost in the snow, which one can hardly agree with, since the bark is located exactly in the place where the products of the hikers were located, and if the products were moved, then the bark would be near this place.

 

Moreover, at the time of the extraction of products, captured in the photographs of 1959, no bark is visible next to the snow pit from which the products are removed.

 

Four partially cut and partially broken branches of fir (fir №19) are at a height of approximately 3m to 4m on one side of this tree.

 

About the same height are the broken branches on the neighboring tree (fir №18), also on one side of the tree.

 

Search with two metal detectors (Garrett Ace 150 and Garrett Ace 400i) in the area up to 15 m around the birch bark flooring (this area was examined almost twice - once by each metal detector) did not give any results.

 

Also, a limited search for the remains of a campfire turned up no results.

 

A pile of dry branches up to 3cm thick was found under fir №18 a few meters from the birch flooring.

 

The remains of a log, most likely harvested by the hikers, was found in the immediate vicinity of the birch flooring. Apparently, it is this log that can be seen near the labaz in the photographs from the search work.

 

Analysis of the cores of the codominant spruce showed that the formation of its two new trunks is associated with the inhibition of the growth of the main trunk, which occurred for about 60 years, which led to its death and the emergence of two new trunks from side branches.

Radial growth of spruce trunks. The green vertical line marks 1959. The absence of some trees seen in the photographs of 1959 can be explained by their death, which is confirmed by numerous finds of remains of birch and fir trunks lying openly on the ground or under turf in the immediate vicinity of the place where the birch bark flooring was found.

Taking into account all other factors, it can be quite reasonably asserted that the mechanical impact on these trees was made by the hikers in 1959 when harvesting branches for flooring under the tent and during the construction of the labaz.

 

The above diagram clearly shows how, until 1959, there was a gradual slowdown in the growth of spruce lateral branches, which is typical for lateral branches located in the lower part of the tree crown, while later their growth increased, which is associated with growth inhibition and (or) death of the main trunk of the spruce.

 

The location of the labaz in this place is not accidental and is explained by the following circumstances.

 

From the group diary of the Dyatlov group, it is known that on January 31, 1959, at the end of the day, they reached the border of the forest, located on the southern slope of the eastern spur of Mt Kholat Syakhl, and began to descend south in search of a suitable place to spend the night.

 

Since a narrow clearing extends from the labaz to the border of the crooked forest and mountain tundra in the direction from south to north (magnetic azimuth), it can be fairly reasonably assumed that the choice of this place is associated with the movement of the hikers from the border of the forest to the place of their future overnight stay along this clearing, where there was a stronger wind crust, and where the tree and shrub vegetation did not interfere with skiing, and this route also agrees very well with the direction of their movement mentioned in the group diary.

The most probable route of the group (red line) on January 31, 1959 - from the border of crooked forests and mountain tundra to the location of the labaz (blue circle) along a clearing on a medium resolution satellite image. The true north and south are indicated, the east declination is about 18°, therefore the final segment of the hikers path to the storehouse passed almost strictly to the south (magnetic azimuth), exactly as written in the group diary.

The hikers did not go down any further into the zone of dark coniferous taiga, since there was no wind crust in this zone, and skiing was complicated by deep loose snow, and the clearing along which they moved ended.

 

The labaz is located on the border of two natural zones: crooked forest and dark coniferous forest, and this is no coincidence, since it was the best place where there was still a fairly strong wind crust, and where there was a minimum but sufficient amount of firewood for a camp fire and the heating stove.

 

The overnight campsite of the Dyatlov group from January 31 to February 1, 1959 and the location of the labaz is confirmed by the following circumstances:

In accordance with almost all the distances indicated in the case files, with the exception of the distance from the stream (160m, not 100m).

 

The labaz is located 400m from the clearing along the stream, most likely created by the searchers during the construction of a landing site near their camp (this landing site was not used for its intended purpose).

 

The labaz is located 1000m from the landing site (and this landing site was located in the mountain tundra and was used for its intended purpose), which is located near the memorial remnant and 500m from the forest border.

 

In addition, the distance from the path to the labaz (10m), indicated by Yuri Yarovoy, practically coincides.

 

This allows us to reasonably assume that the modern trail leading from the clearing, where the expeditions of the Dyatlov Foundation is always based, to the famous memorial remains was created in 1959 during the search work, when the searchers had to constantly trample the path, and which was laid by them along the shortest distance, taking into account the characteristics of the terrain and its passability.

 

The discrepancy between the distance from the stream to the labaz can be explained by inaccuracy or measurement error, perhaps this distance is determined by eye due to its small length.

 

The found place does not contradict the recollections of the searchers Pyotr Bartolomey and Yuri Sahnin about the location of the labaz.

The presence of preserved characteristic trees, identifiable from photographs of the hikers and photographs from search operations.

 

At the same time, temporal changes among coniferous trees are quite significant, which requires a thorough additional examination of the discovered site in order to explain the picture observed now.

The coincidence of forest conditions - the border of the zone of dark coniferous forest and the zone of crooked forest.

The coincidence of the relief and the location of open and overgrown areas of the terrain.

Finds of traces of hikers activities at the campsite (flooring from birch bark, cuts and broken branches on two fir trees, allegedly a harvested log, a bunch of dry branches, codominant spruce and fir).

 

At the same time, finding the camp fire of the group is a rather important.

An understandable and logical choice by the hikers of this particular location: access along a clearing and a spot at the border of two zones, where the wind crust ends and there is plenty of firewood.

At the end of the article, we would like to express gratitude to all the participants in the 2022 expedition and its organizers for their support and assistance in our research.

 

A. V. Konstantinov,
Y. K. Kuntsevich,
A. A. Alekseenkov,
O. Y. Nikulin,
O. A. Nikulina,
A. V. Komanev,
T. A. Hadjiyska,
S. K. Sabirov.

 

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

[fortyck]

Nurse Pelageya Ivanovna Solter, to whom Vadim Chernobrov reached in his research, opened a whole new area for speculations.

 

Testifying to the arrival of corpses in the morgue at the medical facility where she worked, she led many researchers to the idea that not one group of hikers, not only the Dyatlov group, but also another group perished in Kholat Syakhl mountain.

 

Unfortunately, Solter's testimony and accompanying evidence didn't bear each other out.

 

The work with the bodies of surgeon Iosif Davydovich Prudkov and nurse Solter is very difficult to clearly put in a timeline - the testimonies are very confusing.

 

During the interview, the well spoken Victor Solter, sincerely wishing to bring clarity, only confused his wife and led the conversation astray.

 

Pelageya Solter is now a widow, and due to her very advanced age she is not to be bothered with questions.

 

 

Keep reading → https://dyatlovpass.com/interview-solter

 

 

 

 

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

[fortyck]

Why was Solter counting 11 bodies?

 

Many have tried to explain what she constantly throughout her life claimed to be true, beginning long before she became old and forgetful.

 

The prevailing explanation of the inexplicable is that she never actually saw all the bodies at the same time, so she must have confused her encounter with the bodies in the number and chronology.

 

I am claiming the Dyatlov group to be "the perfect storm" in forensics.

 

Not only did the bodies come 3 months apart, but they were also examined in different morgues and by different coroners.

 

The coroner who wrote the official autopsy reports in the case files is Vozrozhdenniy.

 

The bodies Solter washed and prepared for burial were examined only externally by the coroner who worked in the Ivdel hospital - Prudkov.

 

On Feb 26, after the tent was found, prosecutor Vasiliy Tempalov opened an official investigation.

 

On Feb 27 the first bodies were found and the investigators found it necessary to bring Vozrozhdenniy from Sverdlovsk.

 

Since there is no record of any bodies being examined in the morgue in February, but there were rumors circulating of hikers in distress, the explanation we are offering in "1079" is that in the height of the 21st Party Congress, Jan 27 - Feb 5 (Dyatlov group died Feb 1st and were not found until Feb 27, which is highly improbable since the area was buzzing with activity in the name of that same 21st Party Congress, as you will see from my next publication tomorrow July 13), the bodies that nurse Solter remembered washing were returned to the pass.

 

The people that could have pulled this off had to be in top positions in Ivdel.

 

This is very important - everyone is looking for orders from higher up, but this botched coverup was concocted in Ivdel.

 

The bottom line is that if 6 bodies were brought to the Ivdel morgue in early February and examined by Prudkov, then disappeared (we say they were brought back to the pass), and then the official search brought the first group of 5 bodies examined by Vozrozhdenniy, then the body count is 11.

 

No one who saw the 6 bodies was allowed to see Krivonischneko, Doroshenko, Dyatlov, Kolmogorova and Slobodin, which were under "special" investigation.

 

It was "special" because no one knew what's going on, with Krivonischneko quitting his job at Chelyabinsk 40 a secret nuclear facility, and allegedly Kolevatov being a recruit for a KGB agent.

 

Who knows what the deal was with Zolotaryov?

 

The Communist Party didn't like things to be out of their control.

 

If the Dyatlov group was killed on their orders they knew how to cover their tracks.

 

The fact that we have so much information and the lead investigator was allowed to show pictures and diaries without even keeping a record of it, is indicative of negligence, at least at the beginning.

 

When it became clear that something very strange was going on, the case was abruptly closed.

 

In our version of events described in "1079" 6 of the bodies were brought to Ivdel twice.

 

It sounds crazy, right?

 

But if this case is not crazy, then why are we still debating after 64 years and getting more and more tied into knots by the facts?

 

February - 6 bodies - zone morgue - nurse Solter, examiner Prudkov (see drawing with colors and interview)
March - 5 bodies - hospital morgue - examiner Vozrozhdenniy
May - 4 bodies - zone morgue - examiner Vozrozhdenniy

The reports in March clearly state "in the morgue of the central department hospital, N-240" (see end of first paragraph in autopsy reports)
In Russian: "в помещении морга центральной больницы управления п/я Н-240"
𝗠𝗮𝗿 𝟰, 𝟭𝟵𝟱𝟵
Autopsy report of Yuri Doroshenko
https://dyatlovpass.com/case-files-104-111
Autopsy report of Georgiy Krivonischenko
https://dyatlovpass.com/case-files-112-119
Autopsy report of Igor Dyatlov
https://dyatlovpass.com/case-files-120-126
Autopsy report of Zina Kolmogorova
https://dyatlovpass.com/case-files-127-134

𝗠𝗮𝗿 𝟴, 𝟭𝟵𝟱𝟵 (𝗦𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗮𝘆)
Autopsy report of Rustem Slobodin
https://dyatlovpass.com/case-files-95-103

The reports from May say "in the morgue of the N-240 infirmary" which is the Ivdellag morgue (see end of first paragraph in autopsy reports)
In Russian: "в помещении морга санчасти п/я 240"
𝗠𝗮𝘆 𝟵, 𝟭𝟵𝟱𝟵
Autopsy report of Aleksander Kolevatov
https://dyatlovpass.com/case-files-345-348
Autopsy report of Semyon Zolotaryov
https://dyatlovpass.com/case-files-349-351
Autopsy report of Nikolay Thibeaux-Brignolle
https://dyatlovpass.com/case-files-352-354
Autopsy report of Lyudmila Dubinina
 

Ivdel 2 is the village of the Northern Geological Expedition

 

https://dyatlovpass.com/case-files-355-357

 

 

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

[fortyck]

The name "Northern Geological Expedition" is not projecting an accurate perspective of the magnitude of the enterprise.

 

It sounds like a temporary camp with a bunch of trailers.

 

This is because of the word "expedition".

 

Since the Northern Geological Expedition plays a vital role in the Dyatlov Pass incident, I am compelled to show some visuals.

 

The Dyatlov Pass incident happened in the area they were prospecting in 1959.

 

How could the tent and bodies not be found for a month?

 

 

https://dyatlovpass.com/northern-geological-expedition...

 

 

Ivdel-2: Temnikov - radio operator, head of the communications service of the Northern Geological Expedition. https://dyatlovpass.com/whois#temnikov

Prospecting sites could only be reached by helicopter

Ivdel-2: Northern Geological Expedition bus stop called "Headquarters"

Sulman A.M. Jun 1958 - Feb 1962 head of the Serov and Northern Geological Expedition
https://dyatlovpass.com/whois#sulman

 

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

[fortyck]

What was the Northern Geological Expedition doing in 1959?

 

𝗔𝗲𝗿𝗼𝗺𝗮𝗴𝗻𝗲𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝘀𝘂𝗿𝘃𝗲𝘆 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗺𝗮𝗽𝘀 𝟭𝟵𝟱𝟵

 

𝗚𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗵𝘆𝘀𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁𝘀 𝟭𝟵𝟱𝟵 𝗰𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿
Cover of the report on the geophysical work carried out in 1959 in the area of the Dyatlov group route.

𝗖𝗵𝗲𝗰𝗸𝗽𝗼𝗶𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝗶𝗻𝗰𝗹𝘂𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗗𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗰𝘁 𝟰𝟭
Scheme with checkpoints for geophysical surveys in 1959, including District 41

𝗔𝗲𝗿𝗼𝗺𝗮𝗴𝗻𝗲𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝘀𝘂𝗿𝘃𝗲𝘆 𝟭𝟵𝟱𝟵-𝟲𝟬 𝗰𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿
Cover of aeromagnetic survey reports 1959-60, carried out in the area of height 1079.

𝗣𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗻𝗲𝗱 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗮𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗮𝗹 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸 𝟭𝟵𝟱𝟵-𝟲𝟬
Table 4. Planned and actual terms of work in 1959-60.

𝗣𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗻𝗲𝗱 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗮𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗮𝗹 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸 𝟭𝟵𝟱𝟵-𝟲𝟬
Table 4. Continued

𝗥𝗲𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝗮𝗲𝗿𝗼𝗺𝗮𝗴𝗻𝗲𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸 𝗶𝗻 𝟭𝟵𝟱𝟵
Reference to the project of aeromagnetic work, which was originally planned to be carried out for only in 1959

𝗔𝗲𝗿𝗼𝗺𝗮𝗴𝗻𝗲𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝘀𝘂𝗿𝘃𝗲𝘆 𝗺𝗮𝗽
Results of actual measurements, including the area of height 1079, indicating the actual aircraft survey routes.

𝗔𝗲𝗿𝗼𝗺𝗮𝗴𝗻𝗲𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝘀𝘂𝗿𝘃𝗲𝘆 𝗺𝗮𝗽
Results of actual measurements, including the area of height 1079, indicating the actual aircraft survey routes.

𝗠𝗮𝗴𝗻𝗲𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝗔𝗻𝗼𝗺𝗮𝗹𝘆 𝗠𝗮𝗽 𝟭𝟬𝟳𝟵
Results of actual measurements, including the area of height 1079.

 

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

[fortyck]

Перевал Дятлова. НОВАЯ информация о гибели ГРУППЫ ДЯТЛОВА пресс конференция в ЕКБ

 

 

Перевал Дятлова / The Dyatlov Pass.

 

Пресс конференция ТАСС в Екатеринбурге - Новые обстоятельства по делу группы Игоря Дятлова.

 

Товарищи!

 

Присоединяйтесь к нам в наше сообщество "Огненные Шары" t.me/community_fireballs Только вместе мы можем добиться ПРАВДЫ!

 

Ведь возбуждение нового уголовного дела, это реально!

 

Просите - и вам дадут, ищите - и найдете, стучите - и вам откроют.

 

Потому что каждый, кто просит, получает, и кто ищет, находит, и тому, кто стучит, откроют.(Матфея 7:7-11)

 

Ссылка на телеграмм канал Сообщества "Огненные Шары" : t.me/community_fireballs

[fortyck]

On February 11, some of the UPI courses and departments have already started classes.

 

The UPI hikers were returning from their treks.

 

Yuri Blinov’s group had returned with a two-day delay after the deadline.

 

They had covered more than 200 km (124 miles), conquering the peaks of Molebniy Kamen (Prayer Stone), Martay, Beliy Kamen (White Stone), and Denezhkin Kamen (Money Stone).

 

They had met with the Mansi in the headwaters of the Vizhay River and with a group of Moscovites traversing from the Perm Region towards the Denezhkin Kamen.

 

The temperatures had dropped to -50°С (-58°F), but the hikers had overcome all hardships.

 

Photos are what we have from Blinov's archive and together with the Dyatlov group, they are not form Feb 11. Feb 11, 1959, Blinov's group returned back from their expedition.

 

 

#dyatlovpass #1079book

 

Dyatlov and Blinov's groups on a bus to Vizhay. Jan 25. Doroshenko, Kolmogorova, Krivonischenko, Devyatov (with the mandolin), Svechnikova, and Zolotaryov

Vizhay. Blinov group loading the truck. In the truck: Blinov and Eroshev. Jan 25.

Vizhay. A group photo of servicemen with part of the Dyatlov and Blinov groups. In the truck (from left to right): Blinov, Eroshev, and Avdeev. Standing: Svechnikova, Kolmogorova, Sinitsyn, Doroshenko (back), Obodova, Krotov (hands over skis), Tamilova, Strelnikov, Kolevatov, Devyatov, Yudin, and Dyatlov. Jan 25.

Vizhay. A group photo of servicemen with part of the Dyatlov and Blinov groups. Jan 25. In the truck Avdeev with the hood. Left: Blinov. Standing: Doroshenko, Krivonischenko, Svechnikova, Kolmogorova, Sinitsyn, Krotov, Strelnikov, Kolevatov, Yudin, Dyatlov, Devyatov (hat is visible), and Eroshev. Down: Dubinina, officer of military unit 6602, Obodova, Tamilova, officer of military unit 6602.

Vizhay. A group shot of servicemen with part of the Dyatlov and Blinov groups. Jan 25.
Standing: Doroshenko, Dubinina, Krivonischenko, Svechnikova, Kolmogorova, Sinitsyn, Krotov, Strelnikov, Kolevatov, Avdeev, Dyatlov, and Yudin. Sitting: officer of military unit 6602, Obodova, Tamilova, and officer of military unit 6602.

Blinov's group on the route after parting with Dyatlov's group

Blinov's group start off to their final destination Pokrovsk-Uralsky.

 

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

[fortyck]

In the region of Vizhay-Burmantovo-District 41 there are 6 groups that hiked in late January 1959: Pyotr Shtiglits - not confirmed, not on the map, Igor Dyatlov (10), Yuri Blinov (10) - he did not keep a diary for this trek, Anatoliy Shumkov (10), Igor Fomenko (7), and Vladislav Karelin (8).

#dyatlovpass #1079book

 

 

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

[fortyck]

EXPEDITION UNKNOWN through the lens of EVAN B. STONE

While waiting for the UPI to realize the Dyatlov group are missing I am going to follow Expedition Unknown that took place in February 2019, one day at a time.

 

Credit: Stone Films Earth

 

#stonefilmsearth #joshgates #expeditionunknown #dyatlovpass

 

Yekaterinburg–Passazhirsky (Russian: Екатеринбург-Пассажирский) is the central passenger railway station in Yekaterinburg

Evan B. Stone

Evan B. Stone

 

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

[fortyck]

On February 12 Slontsov's group returned.

 

Boris Slobtsov was a third year student of the UPI Department of Power Engineering.

 

They had been to the South Urals, to the Taganay peaks 200 km (124 miles) from Sverdlovsk.

 

February 12 was as well the deadline for the return of the Dyatlov group.

 

Igor had not sent a telegram from Vizhay with a notification of the end of their trek, however, that didn’t ring any alarm bells at the UPI sports club, nor at the city committee for physical culture and sports.

 

Blinov assumed that given the actual situation along the route, a realistic date for the return of the Dyatlov group to Sverdlovsk might be February 15-16.

 

Case file 202 - Project plan for the expedition of Dyatlov group

 

#dyatlovpass #1079book

 

 

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9