Tragedia na Przełęczy Diatłowa (1 luty 1959 r.)

[fortyck]

𝗛𝗔𝗣𝗣𝗬 𝗔𝗣𝗥𝗜𝗟 𝗙𝗢𝗢𝗟'𝗦 𝗗𝗔𝗬

 

New photo reveals the truth about the Dyatlov Pass incident

 

 

#dyatlovpass #1079book

 

 

 

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

[fortyck]

𝟯𝗿𝗱 𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗳𝘁 𝗨𝗣𝗜 𝗠𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵 𝟮𝟰 - 𝗔𝗽𝗿𝗶𝗹 𝟲

 

Sogrin's search group: ?, ? (Physics student), Sychev, Malyutin, Meshtiryakov, Sedov, Eroshev, Dubovtsev. Bottom: Potapov, Shulyatyev, Nevolin, ?

 

 

#dyatlovpass #1079book

 

 

𝟯𝗿𝗱 𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗳𝘁 𝗨𝗣𝗜 𝗠𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵 𝟮𝟰 - 𝗔𝗽𝗿𝗶𝗹 𝟲
Sogrin's search group. ?, ? (Physics student), Sychev, Malyutin, Meshtiryakov, Sedov, Eroshev, Dubovtsev. Bottom: Potapov, Shulyatyev, Nevolin, ?
#dyatlovpass #1079book

𝟯𝗿𝗱 𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗳𝘁 𝗨𝗣𝗜 𝗠𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵 𝟮𝟰 - 𝗔𝗽𝗿𝗶𝗹 𝟲
Sogrin's search group. ?, ? (Physics student), Sychev, Malyutin, Meshtiryakov, Sedov, Eroshev, Dubovtsev. Bottom: Potapov, Shulyatyev, Nevolin, ?
#dyatlovpass #1079book

𝟯𝗿𝗱 𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗳𝘁 𝗨𝗣𝗜 𝗠𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵 𝟮𝟰 - 𝗔𝗽𝗿𝗶𝗹 𝟲
Sogrin's search group. ? (Physics student), Sychev, Malyutin, Meshtiryakov, Sedov, Eroshev, Dubovtsev. Bottom: Yakimenko, Shulyatiev
#dyatlovpass #1079book

 

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

[fortyck]

𝟯𝗿𝗱 𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗳𝘁 𝗨𝗣𝗜 𝗠𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵 𝟮𝟰 - 𝗔𝗽𝗿𝗶𝗹 𝟲

 

Sogrin's search group with military searchers.

 

 

#dyatlovpass #1079book

 

 

𝟯𝗿𝗱 𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗳𝘁 𝗨𝗣𝗜 𝗠𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵 𝟮𝟰 - 𝗔𝗽𝗿𝗶𝗹 𝟲
Sogrin's search group with military searchers.
#dyatlovpass #1079book

𝟯𝗿𝗱 𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗳𝘁 𝗨𝗣𝗜 𝗠𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵 𝟮𝟰 - 𝗔𝗽𝗿𝗶𝗹 𝟲
Sogrin's search group with military searchers.
#dyatlovpass #1079book

𝟯𝗿𝗱 𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗳𝘁 𝗨𝗣𝗜 𝗠𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵 𝟮𝟰 - 𝗔𝗽𝗿𝗶𝗹 𝟲
Sogrin's search group with military searchers.
#dyatlovpass #1079book

𝟯𝗿𝗱 𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗳𝘁 𝗨𝗣𝗜 𝗠𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵 𝟮𝟰 - 𝗔𝗽𝗿𝗶𝗹 𝟲
Sogrin's search group with military searchers.
#dyatlovpass #1079book

 

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

[fortyck]

𝟯𝗿𝗱 𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗳𝘁 𝗨𝗣𝗜 𝗠𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵 𝟮𝟰 - 𝗔𝗽𝗿𝗶𝗹 𝟲

 

 

#dyatlovpass #1079book

 

 

#dyatlovpass #1079book

Valentin Yakimenko and Sergey Sogrin
#dyatlovpass #1079book

Valentin Yakimenko
#dyatlovpass #1079book

 

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

[fortyck]

𝟯𝗿𝗱 𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗳𝘁 𝗨𝗣𝗜 𝗠𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵 𝟮𝟰 - 𝗔𝗽𝗿𝗶𝗹 𝟲

 

Smoke break

 

 

#dyatlovpass #1079book

 

 

Valentin Yakimenko, Vasiliy Shulyatiev, Valeriy Dubovtsev, ?, ?, Victor Malyutin, and Vsevolod Eroshev
#dyatlovpass #1079book

#dyatlovpass #1079book

 

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

[fortyck]

𝟯𝗿𝗱 𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗳𝘁 𝗨𝗣𝗜 𝗠𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵 𝟮𝟰 - 𝗔𝗽𝗿𝗶𝗹 𝟲

 

Searchers in April 1959 at the outlier rock.

 

 

#dyatlovpass #1079book

 

 

 

 

#dyatlovpass #1079book

 

#dyatlovpass #1079book

#dyatlovpass #1079book

#dyatlovpass #1079book

 

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

[fortyck]

𝟯𝗿𝗱 𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗳𝘁 𝗨𝗣𝗜 𝗠𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵 𝟮𝟰 - 𝗔𝗽𝗿𝗶𝗹 𝟲

 

The end of the search shift

 

 

#dyatlovpass #1079book

 

 

Helicopter board №16 of the 142nd Separate Mixed Aviation Squadron
#dyatlovpass #1079book

Helicopter board №16 of the 142nd Separate Mixed Aviation Squadron
#dyatlovpass #1079book

 

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

[fortyck]

Тайна гибели группы Дятлова: 65 лет молчания.

 

Какая тайна скрывается в снегах Урала?

 

 

[fortyck]

𝟰𝘁𝗵 𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗳𝘁 𝗨𝗣𝗜 𝗔𝗽𝗿𝗶𝗹 𝟲-𝟭𝟳

 

The groups of Martyushev, Potapov/Kuzminov, and Avenburg/Starikovskiy.

 

Chernyshev is in charge.

 

 

 

#dyatlovpass #1079book

 

 

 

 

𝗕𝗼𝗿𝗶𝘀 𝗩𝗹𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗺𝗶𝗿𝗼𝘃𝗶𝗰𝗵 𝗠𝗮𝗿𝘁𝘆𝘂𝘀𝗵𝗲𝘃
In 1959 a chairman of the UPI hiking club who together with N.A. Zhelihovskaya prepared the certificate of experience for the Dyatlov group given to the Route commission. Head of the search party in the area of the height 1079 (Apr 6-17). Born in 1938 in Pervouralsk. Hiker, climber, one of the pioneers of the Ural Alps, friend of Igor Dyatlov. After graduating from the metallurgical faculty of UPI, he became a shift foreman, then a senior foreman of cold rolling mills of pipes in workshop B-2 of the Sinarsky Pipe Plant (Kamensk-Uralsky). Organizer of alpsection at the plant. He died on a hike in 1969 while descending from Dalar Peak (Western Caucasus), roped up with Valentina Sevastyanova. Sevastyanova fell and accidentally hit Martyushev in the head with her boot. Then both fell to their deaths.
#dyatlovpass #1079book 

 

#dyatlovpass #1079book 

#dyatlovpass #1079book 

 

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

[fortyck]

𝗔𝗽𝗿𝗶𝗹 𝟭𝟮, 𝟮𝟬𝟭𝟴

 

Exhumation of the body of Semyon Zolotaryov at Ivanovskoe Cemetery in Yekaterinburg.

 

What did we learn?

 

Should we exhume more bodies??

 

 

#dyatlovpass #1079book

 

 

 

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

[fortyck]

Zolotaryov exhumation at Ivanovskoe Cemetery in Yekaterinburg

 

All rights belong to

Komsomolskaya Pravda

.
Authors Nikolai Varsegov and Natalya Varsegova.

Photocorrespondent Алексей Булатов

 

In recollection, nine tourists leaded by Igor Dyatlov went on a trek in the winter of 1959 in the mountains of the Northern Urals.

 

A month later the rescuers discovered their cut tent.

 

And in a radius of one and a half kilometers from it - five frozen bodies.

 

The corpses of the rest were found only in May.

 

Almost all the tourists were stripped and half-dressed.

 

Some had fatal injuries.

 

It is not clear even to these days why the hikers ran away at a severe cold to their demise.

 

29 January 1959 Lozva river, Thibeaux-Brignolle camera frame №10

 

Semyon Zolotaryov, as we have already said, is the most mysterious person in the perished group.

 

Semyon - according to the documents, was Alexander (as Zolotaryov introduced himself) was born in the Kuban village Udobnoy on February 2, 1921.

 

This is what he wrote in his autobiographies.

 

However, according to the church calendar, his date of birth is March 1, 1921.

 

In October 1941, Zolotaryov was drafted and he went through the whole war without a single wound.

 

After the victory he graduated from Minsk Institute of Physical Culture.

 

He left for Lermontov, a closed city due to uranium mining.

 

He got a job as a physical education teacher.

 

Was a member of the CPSU.

 

At one of the party meetings Zolotaryov was asked directly: Why did you hide from everyone that your brother worked for the Germans during the war ?! (KP has a certified copy of this document).

 

However, despite this scandalous fact at the time, Zolotaryov remains to work in a secret city whose name was forbidden to be mentioned in letters and even to pronounce aloud.

 

He was not expelled from the party either.

 

In 1959, going on that fateful journey through the Northern Urals, Semen Zolotaryov announced enigmatically to his students "this whole world will start talking about this trek."

 

He did not say anything in particular, only that they will soon find out about everything.

 

... The corpse of Zolotaryov was discovered three months after the tragedy.

 

It was almost impossible to recognize him.

 

In the autopsy report, strange tattoos and an inscription tattooed "DAERMMUAZUAYA" are described.

 

But relatives do not remember this tattoo.

 

His students who saw their teacher undressed to the waist in physical education classes don't remember it either.

 

Seven of the dead students were buried at the Mikhailovskoye cemetery in Sverdlovsk.

 

Semyon Zolotaryov and Yuri Krivonishchenko for some reason were buried separately in the Ivanovskoe cemetery.

 

Their graves are next to each other. Recently Zolotaryov's relatives gathered to put Semen a monument instead of a dilapidated rough obelisk crowned with a star.

 

But then another great mystery came up.

 

It turned out that Semen Zolotaryov generally does not appear in the lists of the buried at Ivanovskoe cemetery.

 

The grave under the obelisk with the inscription "Semyon Zolotaryov" is not listed to belong to anybody.

 

In other words, according to the documentation, Semyon Zolotaryov was never buried at the Ivanovskoe cemetery!

 

The grave of Semyon Zolotarev - presumably

 

When Semyon's relatives asked us to help understand this story, we studied the documentation of all the cemeteries in Yekaterinburg, including, of course, Mikhailovskoye.

 

It turned out that Semyon Zolotaryov has never been buried in this city, and where his remains are is unknown.

 

So who then rests under the obelisk of Zolotaryov?

 

And who is buried there?

 

With all these questions on their mind, Semyon's relatives asked us to do an exhumation.

 

How difficult it was to get permission to open a non-existent (according to the documents) grave is a whole different story.

 

Let's just say that it took us more than a year to achieve this.

 

And now with an eminent Moscow forensic expert (who we will not name yet) we came to the place of work.

 

The workers' brigade quickly got to the remains.

 

The grave was filled up not so much with dirt as with large stones.

 

There was nothing left from the coffin, not even some decaying debris.

 

Nothing left of the clothes of the deceased, only two buttons and two soles of shoes, size men's 42-43.

 

But the bones and the skull are safe.

 

There is only one front upper tooth missing.

 

The absence of this tooth was not mentioned in Zolotaryov's autopsy report.

 

Only two buttons and two soles are left from the clothes and shoes

 

Workers open the grave

 

Our forensic expert determined right away that the remains were male.

 

At the time of death, the man was 35-40 years old.

 

And he was a smoker with experience, which is clearly visible from his teeth.

 

The remains will be scrutinized, and it's too early to talk about the final conclusions.

 

So far, from the preliminary observations we can see fused fracture of the fibula on the right leg.

 

The reasons for the injury could be various.

 

We can't rule out a bullet wound.

 

Another experienced expert was surprised by the unusual work of the dentist.

 

On the right of the last wisdom tooth, there is a small fake cap.

 

Its meaning and purpose are absolutely unfathomable.

 

Maybe experienced dentists can say something on the matter in the forum?

 

Strange fake cap behind the left wisdom tooth

 

Thickening on the fibula is indicative of an old fracture

 

Forensic expert conducts a preliminary examination

 

In the following days KP will conduct an examination of the DNA of the person buried under Zolotaryov's obelisk to establish his kinship with the alleged nephews.

 

And also KP will study together with experts fractures of the ribs of Semyon.

 

It turned out that the autopsy reports don't quite match the injuries they found during the excavation.

 

After the exhumation, the grave was brought to proper order

 

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

[fortyck]

The secret of Dyatlov Pass.

 

It was a very powerful blow.

 

"Komsomolskaya Pravda" received the first results of exhumation of the body of Semyon Zolotaryov

 

All rights belong to

Komsomolskaya Pravda

. Authors Nikolai Varsegov, TV and radio presenter Anton Chelyshev and Natalya Varsegova.

Photo correspondent Aleksey Bulatov

 

 

Expert Sergey Nikitin conducting a skull superimposition

 

In recollection, nine tourists leaded by Igor Dyatlov went on a trek in the winter of 1959 in the mountains of the Northern Urals.

 

A month later the rescuers discovered their cut tent.

 

And in a radius of one and a half kilometers from it - five frozen bodies.

 

The corpses of the rest were found only in May.

 

Almost all the tourists were stripped and half-dressed.

 

Some had fatal injuries.

 

It is not clear even to these days why the hikers ran away at a severe cold to their demise.

 

On April 12 at the Ivanovskoe Cemetery in Yekaterinburg, we exhumed the body of one of the most mysterious members of Dyatlov's group - Semyon Zolotaryov.

 

We will talk for the time being with the prefix - presumably - Zolotaryov, because DNA expertise is not yet ready.

 

The very moment when the skull was found

 

We are asked: why did you do this?

 

We answer:

1. Identify who lies in the grave under a tomb sign "Semyon Zolotaryov". There are no documents for this burial either from relatives or from the service of urban cemeteries. And it became absolutely unclear whether someone was buried there.
2. And if we find remains in the grave, then we can evaluate the nature of the injuries of the skeleton.

 

At our request, exhumation was conducted by forensic expert of the Moscow Bureau of Forensic Expertise Sergey Nikitin.

 

Also at the cemetery was a tragedy researcher, doctor Galina Sazonova.

 

We talked with them on the radio "Komsomolskaya Pravda" (97.2 Moscow), where they commented on the first results of the examinations.

 

Here is the transcript of the conversation.

 

Where did the stones come from?

 

Sergey Nikitin (SN): The grave turned out to be very peculiar.

 

There was even a question, whether such burial is typical.

 

It turned out that the grave was covered 90 percent with large pieces of granite and sprinkled with fine granite.

 

Correspondents (Cor): There is talk that the grave was opened, and then it was simply filled up with stones.

 

SN: I believe that in Ivanovskoe Cemetery almost all the graves are covered with stones, as it is on the mountain.

 

When all the stones were extracted, we found the skeleton, which lies in the position on the back, legs - to the east.

 

This is Orthodox orientation.

 

They began to extract the bones of the skeleton.

 

Galina and I laid out the bones in anatomical order on the sheets of cardboard.

 

In particular, Galina was laying out his ribs.

 

I was at that time handling the skull.

 

It had to be washed and drained.

 

Galina Sazonova laying down the ribs

 

Cor: You took the skull in your hands and immediately said that it was the skull of a man and he was 35-40 years old.

SN: In such studies, the first questions to answer are: gender, age and race type of the person.

 

So this skeleton belongs to a man, the age is within 35-40 years, the racial type is europeoid.

 

Even individual bones can be the object of age determination.

 

But the most informative is the skull, and then - the teeth.

 

More correctly, their degree of deterioration.

 

They allow you to more objectively and accurately determine the age with a special table.

 

The skeleton of this man was within 35-40 years.

 

And Zolotaryov should have turned 38 years old.

 

We also estimate the dental status.

 

We evaluate the traces of dental intervention.

 

Absolutely, the condition of the teeth corresponded to that described at the autopsy in 1959.

 

The same crowns of stainless steel on the same teeth.

Cor: There was one interesting crown.

SN: Yes, a kind of crown of the seventh tooth, the adjacent tooth was on the same root.

 

And this crown is on the second root.

 

These are the particulars of the dentist's approach.

 

Apparently, he decided that it would be most efficient to intervene in this way.

Cor: Can this false crown be a spy tab?

 

Sorry for this question, but it is asked on the forums.

SN: These are just features of the dental work.

 

The doctor decided to preserve the roots as much as possible, so that the person could chew more fully.

Galina Sazonova (GS): Are crowns like this common in places of detention? (There is a version that instead of Semyon is buried a runaway convict - ed. note)

SN: There is nothing unusual in this dental work.

 

Somewhat above average.

 

Nothing remarkable or different.

 

Conventional crowns are made of stainless steel.

GS: I helped only at the first stage, when they were still cleaning the bones from the ground, working with a brush.

 

I did preliminary filtration of the bones.

 

I did not do the expert layout of the skeleton.

 

I have a question: where did the front tooth go?

SN: This loss occurred on April 12 this year, in the process of extracting the skull from the grave.

 

We did not have time to look for it.

 

He remained in the grave.

GS: Were there any other damages to the skull?

SN: The skull was not damaged.

 

All the traumas occurred on the chest.

GS: Why isn't there any hair?

SN: This is a particular phenomenon.

 

In some graves, hair is preserved under certain conditions.

 

Even after hundreds of years, hair is perfectly preserved.

 

And in other graves the hair is gone.

 

Expert Sergey Nikitin washes the skull for the superimposition forensic method

 

PERFECT MATCH

 

Cor: Can you tell us more about the this forensic method, superimposition, that you are using?

SN: This method was developed in 1956 by Yuri Mikhailovich Kubitsky, a Soviet military expert.

 

He suggested that you can identify a person by putting a photographic image on the image of the skull.

 

The skull is on the stand in front of the camera.

 

At that time, the negative of the image was superimposed on the frosted glass of the viewfinder.

 

By rotating, moving the skull and moving away, approaching it with respect to the lens, the skull was inscribed along the points, the contours were compared.

 

And then we look at the conjunction of the contours.

Cor: What are the points where the images match?

SN: The main points are the ears, the corners of the eyes, under the nose, the point of the line of closure of the lips, under the chin, the contours of the parietal, the parietal-temporal, the temporal, the lower contour of the face.

 

There are a number of other points.

 

The maximum number of point to match are 24, if we have a high-quality photograph of a bald man and if the skull has no significant losses.

 

But for identification, 12 signs are sufficient provided that we know the sex of the person and his age.

 

In our case, there were 13 points.

 

This indicates those are the remains of Semyon Zolotaryov.

 

The portrait of Semyon and the image of his skull coincided in 13 main positions

 

HE WAS LAYING ON SOMETHING SOLID

 

GS: In 1959, the forensic pathologist described that there were two fracture lines of Zolotaryov ribs.

 

"After the extraction of the organs from the thoracic and abdominal cavities, fractures of the second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth ribs on the right along the parasternal line and midaxillary line are determined."

 

How much did it coincide with what we saw?

SN: This coincided almost completely.

 

Except for a small minor amendment.

 

I would define the axillary line not as an average, but as a back axillary line.

 

Some bones were not examined.

 

We looked at the right shoulder blade, there were three fractures.

 

The act of this was not noted.

 

I assumed first that this is a posthumous injury.

 

The whole grave was covered with pieces of granite, the pressure on the bones of the skeleton can't be ignored.

 

But then I reassessed, because the left shoulder was intact.

 

If there were posthumous damages, it is logical to assume that both the left shoulder blade would be broken and in general would be other multiple fractures on the bones of the skeleton.

GS: Yes, we did not see damages like that.

 

We found much more fragile bones.

 

Even thyroid cartilage.

 

And the skull itself is not crushed.

 

It turns out that this weight had no effect on the bones.

SN: During the burial after the funeral the stones were laid to form a vault.

 

They didn't press down.

 

The ribs were broken on the right, and the right shoulder blade.

 

This fits into the mechanism of fracture of the ribs.

GS: Is it correct to say that the chest as a construction can have structural fractures?

 

In other words, one blow could cause several fractures?

SN: This indicates that at the contact zone, the impact exceeded the sizes from the first to the sixth rib.

 

It was a large heavy mass.

 

Most likely, snow.

GS: Can you determine when this injury took place?

 

Photo of Zolotoryov's grave in 1959

 

SN: The presence of blood in the pleural cavity of Zolotaryov unequivocally indicates that he was alive.

GS: In what position was the person at the time of injury?

SN: It can be undoubtedly said that he was lying on his back.

 

And the traumatic effect occurred from front to back, maybe some what from right to left.

GS: The surface on which the person was lying was relatively firm?

SN: Yes.

 

It is unlikely that he was lying in the snow.

GS: You found that not all ribs are broken equally.

 

Is it possible to say that the force that acted on the thorax in full force acted where the ribs are completely broken?

 

And where they are not completely broken, it seems like the impact was less?

SN: The ribs on the axillary line have broken as a result of excessive bending.

 

This is called flexural nature of the fractures.

 

In the parasternal line, the character of the fractures was extensor.

 

This suggests that the traumatic event occurred at the time when the person was lying on his back, and suggests the direction where the mass came from.

GS: Like as if squeezed a concrete slab?

 

Or is it from the compression of a blow?

 

There is a version that a lot of snow has fallen.

SN: Was it impact or slow squeezing that took some time?

 

When the corpse is examined not to the extent of decomposition in which the corpse of Zolotaryov was at the time of the autopsy, there are soft tissues, subcutaneous fatty tissue, one can estimate the hemorrhage into the subcutaneous fatty tissue.

 

If it was a blow, we would see hemorrhages in the muscles and subcutaneous fatty tissue.

 

If this mass of the snow layer type squeezed gradually, it is unlikely that we would see hemorrhaging.

GS: Hemorrhages were noted at the autopsy.

 

And on histology, and in the act.

SN: This suggests that it was a sudden pressure, a velocity impact.

 

Not gradual.

Cor: It's like a blow, lets say, by a car?

SN: A car is a comparison.

 

In our case, we can say that this was the impact of a large mass.

GS: Could it be caused by explosive blast?

SN: It can be safely excluded.

 

Injuries would be of a different nature.

 

WHAT CAUSED THE FRACTURE?

 

Cor: On the tibia of the foot, a callus was found, which indicates an intravital fracture.

 

But there is an opinion that Semyon never had any injuries.

SN: During the investigation, a trace of a long-term intravital fracture of the right tibia in its middle part was found.

 

It is impossible to judge the limitation period of a fracture.

GS: Can you judge the nature of the healing from such callus?

SN: The two halves were aligned along the axis.

 

There was no dislocation.

 

The banal fracture.

 

Maybe he was formed in his childhood.

 

Zolotarev went through the whole war.

 

A bullet wound is unlikely, but we can't rule it out.

 

If the bullet shoots through the bone, it will be a defect - a shortening of the bone.

 

Photo of Semyon used by expert Sergey Nikitin for the skull superimposition

 

Photo of Semyon used by expert Sergey Nikitin for the skull superimposition

 

FROM THE AUTHORS

 

Could a tourist with such traumas walk a mile and a half along the slope?

 

We thank Sergey Nikitin and Galina Sazonova for an interesting conversation, and the work done.

 

We want to add that in the certificate of death of Semyon Zolotaryov, issued on May 12, 1959 by the Registry Office of Yekaterinburg, to his mother, it appears that he died from "low temperature."

 

As the results of the examinations show, this is not the whole truth.

 

After the broadcast, we asked additional questions to expert Nikitin, to clarify the picture of what happened.

 

If we assume that a huge layer of snow came on top of, lets say, Semyon Zolotaryov, when he was in the tent, could he move with injuries of this nature?

 

I think he might some how.

 

But this is unlikely for Lyuda Dubinina.

 

She had a much bigger deformity of the chest and her injuries were worse.

 

When Semyon was found in the stream, there was a camera on his chest.

 

A pretty heavy thing in those times.

 

Could he have gone with such injuries and with a camera around his neck?

 

 It is unlikely that the camera prevented him from moving.

 

But we can not say with certainty where he suffered the rib injury.

 

You can speculate this scenario.

 

In the creek were found two people with rib fractures and another with a trauma to the skull.

 

Therefore, we can not exclude the version that they dug out the den in the ravine, but the snow collapsed and covered them.

 

However, we still have to thoroughly examine the nature of the injuries of Semyon's ribs.

 

We plan to conduct a more thorough examination of the skeleton based on photo and video materials that were shot during the exhumation.

 

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

[fortyck]

Galina Sazonova - participant in Zolotaryov’s exhumation

 

 

Galina Sazonova in her own words: “I am a doctor (GP pediatrician) with 20 yeas experience.

 

We moved to Vietnam in 2007, since that time I have been working in SOS International in Saigon.

 

I have a privet practice now.

 

I'm interesting in this story for 5 years now.

 

In 2014-2015 Russian official forensic expert Eduard Tumanov confirmed some of my suppositions about the traumas, but we didn't have enough information about the rib fractures to understanding how it was possible to get this injury.

 

Exhumation gave answers for some questions.

 

We saw the ribs and understood how each rib was fractured.

 

We established 3 fractures of the R scapula (Vozrozhdenny didn't describe this injuries in 1959).

 

Sergey Nikitin's conclusion is "it was one single impact, Zolotarev was laying on the back at that moment (scapula fractures)" I don't agree))) I suppose its could be two successive blows.

 

But I'm not expert) “

 

 

 

GS: Sergey Nikitin is one of the famous specialist of scull reconstruction and body identification.

 

Please remember, that the main question of the exhumation was identification of the body.

 

Not assessment of traumas which regulated by different law.

 

We are lucky that soft tissue is not preserved and we could see the bones in excellent condition.

 

If soft tissue has been preserved we would not have the right to clean bones for examination.

Chest injury has to be seen as a complex, we are looking for a forensic expert specialized in this type of trauma assessment for second opinion.

 

Q: It appears that you had limited time and the bones did not leave the cemetery.

GS: Any remains except a little piece of bone for further DNA tests, were laid back in the new grave.

 

The tomb of Zolotaryov is indeed Zolotaryov's grave.

 

And we tried to make a good job of putting everything back together with great respect.

 

This is purely to straighten the official records.

 

It had to be proven that this is his grave not just a piece of land with tombstone.

 

Now there will be a procedure to confirm that this is Zolotaryov's grave with the DNA comparison with the DNA of family members.

 

Only then, after the paperwork is properly filed in the registry will the family have the right to do anything with the grave or transfer the remains somewhere else, if they want to.

 

Q: Can it be established whether the damage to Zolotaryov's rib cage was made by one single impact, or several blows?

 

GS: According to expert Nikitin, this was a one-time sudden impact to a person lying on his back.

 

My opinion is that there could be two different strong blows.

 

We are currently seeking second opinions of other experts.

Ribs break down constructively due to a certain flexibility.

 

At the point of direct impact there will be an extensor fracture, but the rib will be slightly bent and at a certain distance there will be a remote flexural fracture forming a second line.

 

With a strong impact, two additional lines may appear as in this case.

Sergey Nikitin, forensic medical expert, says that that as a result of applying force on the front to the right of the sternum (extensor fractures), there will be structural flexion in the axillary line (these are the points of maximum physiological bending), and no questions about the shoulder blade on the back.

 

His theory is that Zolotaryov lies on his back, something presses from front to back, brakes the bones both in front and back.

 

 

 

GS: And I do not agree with this.

 

Firstly, it is not mentioned in any literature that as a result of such compression the scapula will break at all.

 

And secondly, Sergey Nikitin did not project this onto the skeleton as a whole, taking into account the position of the bones relative to each other.

 

And then the shoulder blade for some reason breaks where the ribs do not break.

My opinion is that Zolotaryov suffered two different blows.

 

First on the back to the area of the protruding ridge.

 

The ridge is strong, withstood, but from it up and down went the cracks in the form of a triangle (this is the break from the blow on the shoulder and it is described a lot in the literature), and then there was a second blow - in the chest area.

 

GS: We expected that there would be zink (galvanized) coffin.

 

No traces of zink what so ever.

 

There was a lot of wood, but individual chips measuring up to 10-15 cm and up to 3-5 cm in thickness, and they crumbled into dust right away.

 

Yellowish orange.

 

It is visible on the video, if you look closely.

 

The bones were not in a pile but the order expected to find a grave if the body was laid normally.

 

The bones of the legs were in one end of the grave, the skull - in the opposite.

 

The skull was almost the last piece we found, slightly on the side.

 

We searched for the tooth, but it can also be fallen into the dirt to the side.

 

The hole had no dirt whatsoever, and yet on the dirty lower jam you can't even see the "false" tooth cap.

The grave.

 

First there was the earth.

 

Then the stones.

 

Then again the earth about 30 cm, very friable, almost sand.

 

And in it - bones.

 

There is the impression that they threw earth on the coffin, then stones and then again earth.

 

When we saw the stones, we were very much afraid that we will find everything crushed.

 

However, all the bones are in surprisingly excellent condition.

 

We even found the notorious thyroid cartilage (!) and it was not damaged.

Buttons are simple plastic, black.

 

Cheap, no studs.

The rope ...

 

I wouldn't call it a rope, but a narrow ribbon.

 

Either from a nylon, or from silk.

 

You know the kind that is denser on the edges?

 

The edge is dense.

 

When I get home I'll look online for something similar.

 

It doesn't look like a piece of clothing.

 

Gravediggers immediately said that his hands were tied together.

 

They have a great experience in exhumations.

 

They are a special dedicated team, not some not enthusiasts.

The shoe soles.

 

I can't say what were they made of.

 

Either skin, or a very dense feathered felt.

 

I somehow got the impression that these are special funerary slippers with a cloth top that decomposed.

 

Q: What's with the yellow orange color that persists throughout this whole case?

 

Do you have an explanation?

 

Can it be examined now that we can obtain a sample of it.

 

GS: You mean the orange color of the skin and clothes about which relatives talked about?

There can be no answer to this question now, because soft tissues have not been preserved at all, especially skin to give them for examination.

 

From clothes, too, there was nothing left, although for sure he was buried in other clothes, new.

 

Q: I meant in this paragraph you said the trigger word yellow orange color.

 

Nobody ask questions about this color?

 

It's orange again.

I meant in this paragraph you said the trigger word yellow orange color.

 

Nobody ask questions about this color?

 

It's orange again.

We expected that there would be zink (galvanized) coffin.

 

No traces of zink what so ever.

 

There was a lot of wood, but individual chips measuring up to 10-15 cm and up to 3-5 cm in thickness, and they crumbled into dust right away.

 

Yellowish orange.

 

It is visible on the video, if you look closely.

 

GS: No) this is what the rest of the tree looks like.

 

In the beginning, in the first interview, Natalya said "there was no coffin."

 

She meant that the coffin was not preserved.

 

Then I wrote that we saw the remains of the coffin in the form of yellowish splinters.

 

Because then they will be able to see in the photo against the background of a darker land.

 

 

 

GS: The rope ...

 

I would not call it a rope, but a narrow ribbon.

 

Either from a nylon, or from silk.

 

Do you know when it's so denser on the edges?

 

The edge is dense.

 

It looks like a piece of clothing.

 

Gravediggers immediately said - they tied their hands together.

 

Natalya Varsegova posted in taina.li

 

Q: Was this rope tied in a knot(s) and found in the chest (or feet) area or was the rope loose in the grave?

 

What was the length of the rope?

There is a common practice to tie the hands and feet of the body in the coffin.

 

If old generation relatives are present they start fussing about untying the corpse so s/he can move freely in the in the afterlife.

If the corpse was bound, does it mean there were no relatives at the burial to prompt them to untie it.

 

But wait, the coffin was closed, so why to tie a corpse in a closed coffin?!

 

GS: Rope-ribbon.

 

I did not noticed when did it appeared.

 

The land was thrown by two workers, we chose bones from the land that had been dumped.

 

Precisely not at the very beginning, but also much earlier than the appearance of the skull.

 

We started from the feet and walked to the head.

 

It was taken out of the earth by someone else.

Shoe soles were the first find.

The tape is not wider than 1 cm.

 

It is narrow.

 

In my opinion has a certain stiffness.

 

Was there brilliance?

 

Rather yes.

 

But it's dirty.

 

How long is it?

 

Who knows, I did not measure and did not see that someone would measure.

It looked all right.

 

Someone said "look, a rope."

 

The workers immediately answered "his hands were tied".

 

The rope was not interesting to investigate, there was much more at stake.

 

It did not cause any conspiracy questions.

Moreover, I will add.

 

When I sifted the earth, it seemed to me that there were fragments of strongly decayed black dense tissue.

 

I do not know how to explain.

 

This is until the clump of land is not shredded, you see some structure.

 

When you take it in your hands everything turns into dust.

I personally expected that he would be buried in a military tunic, with shoulder straps.

 

Those and the mood I had in this direction.

 

Nothing to confirm my hopes.

Guys, there is a picture you draw and what you expect.

 

We were expecting zinc.

 

We expected a completely different state of the remains, the type of the general's version from Turkey.

 

We discussed what we would do if we preserved the mummified soft tissues.

 

This was the worst option, because we could not see the fractures.

 

And, excuse me, no one was going to build a fire and boil the bones in a bowler hat.

 

Who watched the series of dice - will understand what I mean.

When the bones went, and even in the state in which they went, I personally sighed with relief, because this arrangement was the most informative.

 

Unlike other options.

If only a little soft cloth were preserved on the skull, the superimposition method would be in question.

 

What happened was the most ideal option in terms of assessing injuries.

 

We concentrated on injuries.

The rope is not important.

 

It's part of the clothes or a burying accessory.

 

Q: There are a lot of discussions how come Zolotaryov's teeth were stained as a smoker but he is not smoking on the photographs we have of him.

 

Although Valentin Degterev (Валентин Дегтерёв) claims Zolotaryov is pulling a cigarette in this photo.

 

 

 

 

 

GS: I do not see a problem.

 

Even if he did not smoke in 1959, it is not at all a fact that he did not smoke during the Second World War.

 

There really was a very specific plaque from the inside of the teeth, and I'm not sure that it would have been visible if there was gum.

 

Straight on the neck of the tooth.

Тhe expert mentioned the smoking right away.

 

We need to know that Nikitin doesn't follow Dyatlov case, he does not know anything about Semyon and evaluated him very impartially and professionally.

 

I generally admire the expert!

 

I have not been able to communicate with Tumanov (modern times forensic pathologist in Russia who revised the post mortem analyses of the last four bodies found) and there is no personal feeling.

 

Q: I know you mentioned that his grave seems to be in order, and that it's not likely that the case will be reopened, but do you think that if the experts deduce any sort of new evidence pointing to foul play that the Russian government may reopen it?

 

Or do you think that this is simply unlikely due to the advance stage of decay in the body?

 

GS: Of course - no.

 

It didn’t make any difference if we found no body or 3 bodies in the grave, government has made the decision to close the case in 1959 and will continue keeping the secret.

Watch "The end of the story" and read Shkrybach's conclusion .

 

GS: I don't think the grave was reopened.

 

Everything was done in 1959.

 

Even if the grave was opened previously it could happened long time ago only while the body was still preserved.

 

It is impossible to put bones back to the grave in the position bones were found.

I was pretty sure we won’t not find the ribs.

 

Semyon Zolotaryov autopsy report doesn’t say his chest was deformed.

 

But on this photo after the autopsy his chest looks very out of shape.

 

Semyon Zolotaryov after the autopsy

 

Lyuda's chest on the other hand looks normal even though she has more fractures.

 

Lyudmila Dubinina after the autopsy

 

It looks like Vozrozhdenny took out Zolotaryov’s rib's complex for additional investigation or tests.

 

I was surprised to see all the ribs in the grave without and traces of surgical manipulation.

 

Expert could have done it but he didn't.

 

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

[fortyck]

DNA resuts exclude kinship of the person laying in Zolotaryov’s grave with Zolotaryov’s niece

 

«Komsomolskaya Pravda» and the Channel 1 aired sensational results of genetic analysis.

 

Thibeaux-Brignolle camera - 29 January 1959 Lozva river

 

In recollection. In the winter of 1959, nine tourists led by Igor Dyatlov, a graduate from the Urals Polytechnic Institute disappeared in the north of the Sverdlovsk region.

 

The investigation found that in the middle of the night they, for unclear reasons, cut the tent and fled into the forest without outer clothing and shoes.

 

Six died of hypothermia, and three of them sustained fatal injuries.

 

The causes of the tragedy were never clarified, and the investigation was classified.

 

WHAT WAS THE PURPOSE OF THE EXHUMATION?

 

Question: Is it Semyon Zolotaryov who is buried in the grave under the monument to Semyon Zolotaryov, the researchers of the secrets of the Dyatlov Pass have asked this question for a long time.

 

The main reason for this is the strange tattoos on the corpse, presumably Zolotaryov.

 

None of the relatives remembers these tattoos.

 

The condition of the body when discovered was in no condition to be identified. In addition, there is no reliable information that any of his relatives identified him.

 

There was no record of Zolotaryov ever been buried in 1959 at the Ivanovskoe Cemetery in Yekaterinburg.

 

This gave reason to Semyon's relatives to exhume and establish kinship with the help of DNA expertise.

 

Semyon Zolotaryov, as we wrote many times before, is the eldest and most mysterious of the perished group.

 

In that fateful trek, he turned out to be a stranger from outside.

 

The rest of the members of the group were 10-15 years younger and nobody knew the 37-year-old newcomer.

 

Semyon went through the whole war without a single wound.

 

After the end of the war, he did not go straight home, but enlisted the Minsk Institute of Physical Education.

 

Every time he wrote his autobiography, he confused in significant events from his life.

 

He even gave incorrect information about his combat awards.

 

Before leaving for his last expedition Semyon said to his students a mysterious statement: "The whole world will talk about this expedition."

 

And his words turn out to be prophetic.

 

We, journalists of KP, willingly helped Semyon's relatives, because we also needed answers to a number of questions.

 

For example, to establish the nature of bone fractures found on the body of Semyon by forensic expert in 1959.

 

Check the radiation background of the remains, etc.

 

Forensic medical expert Sergei Nikitin performed the method of superimposition of Zolotaryov’s photo and the skull from the grave, directly at the cemetery.

 

Right there on the spot, Nikitin concluded that the person who is captured in the photo is buried in the grave.

 

According to relatives the photo used for the skull superimposition was of undoubtedly of Sеmyon.

 

Forensic expert conducts a preliminary examination. Photo Alexey Bulatov

 

First examination comparing the DNA of Zolotaryov's bone remains and the DNA of his native niece Tatyana Skulbeda and nephew Pavel Leshchenko.

 

Both are the children of Semyon's sister Mary.

 

And at the moment both are the closest relatives of Semyon.

 

Taking sampling material for DNA examination. Photo Nikolay Varsegov

 

And here the stunning results DNA testing, made with the help of samples from the alleged Semyon and his niece Tatyana.

 

According to the conclusion of a geneticist, the blood relationship on the maternal line is excluded (!).

 

"THE RESULTS ARE CONCLUSIVE"

 

About this new sensational secret of the Dyatlov Pass, we talked on the air of the radio "Komsomolskaya Pravda" (97.2 FM) with the geneticist Alexei Garkovenko, who conducted the DNA-examination.

 

- Alexey, what is the essence of the method that you used in the analysis?

 

- In the cells of each person there are organelles (cell particles), which are called mitochondria.

 

They are passed from mother to child.

 

This is the so-called kinship along the female line.

 

The method consists in comparing DNA sections.

 

If the relationship is close, then the sites will be similar.

We sequenced* two DNA sections from bone tissue.

 

In one the DNA was unreadable.

 

In the other we got a chain that we could work with.

 

And in it there were 4 mismatches with Tatyana's DNA.

 

If it is more than three, kinship is excluded.

 

* - Sequencing is the general name of methods that allow the sequence of nucleotides (biological substances) to be established in a DNA molecule.

 

- And how to explain the discrepancy between the skull superimposition and the results obtained by you?

 

- Generally, genetics is a more accurate method.

 

And I have no doubt about the results.

 

- Alexey, there is an opinion that DNA extraction from bone tissue takes quite a long time - up to three weeks.

 

And you have finished in three days!

 

- Takes a long time?

 

This is complete nonsense!

 

Look how it works.

 

The bone is grinded, filled with an enzyme solution, the cells are cleaved and a full comparative analysis can be obtained in a day.

 

The bone that you, the journalists of the Komsomolka, provided were dissolved for 8 hours.

 

It took another 1.5 hours to compare to the other DNA and get the results.

 

This is the standard procedure.

 

- But you were not able to get results right away.

 

- It's true.

 

We first isolated nuclear DNA (the Y-chromosome in the male line), but it turn out to be broken.

 

Very bad in that.

 

Then we decided to look at the mitochondrial DNA along the female line.

 

And it turned out to be good.

 

- How often do you have to extract DNA from bones of such a long time ago?

 

- It is rare.

 

Usually the bones not more that 10 years old.

 

But one time we isolated nuclear DNA from bones 400 years ago.

 

- And how do you establish kinship?

 

- I'll explain as easily as possible.

 

We are all ancestors from one woman in this or that perspective.

 

And when analyzing, we always consider how the common ancestors of those people whose DNA we compare have long ago dispersed.

 

And as for your expertise, the common cells of the alleged Seeds and his niece Tatyana diverged more than 1000 years ago!

 

That is, they can not be relatives not that in the next three generations, but even deeper.

 

- To be honest, it's very difficult to believe in such stunning results.

 

Almost impossible!

 

- I can’t help it.

 

I am confident in these results by 100 percent.

 

 

DNA test results

 

2ND OPINION

 

On the air of the radio "Komsomolskaya Pravda" we called the famous forensic expert Eduard Tumanov and asked his opinion.

 

- This is not an examination of direct kinship, so there are questions about it, - said Tumanov.

 

- I don’t want to question the professionalism of these geneticists, but private laboratories, as far as I know, do not have enough experience to carry out examinations of this degree of complexity.

 

I believe that you need to contact the Russian Center for Forensic Medical Examination.

 

They have both skills and equipment for conducting such studies more weighty.

 

RINGING THE RELATIVES

 

We called Julia Orehova, Semyon Zolotaryov's grandniece.

 

- We are shocked by this result,

 

- Julia shared with us.

 

- We were sure that Simyon Zolotaryov would be in the grave.

 

And if it's not him, then we need to file an application with the investigative committee with a request to open a criminal case and find out who was buried in 1959 under a memorable sign with a tablet bearing the name of our relative.

 

Historical sensation: a DNA test for the most mysterious member of the Dyatlov group.

 

In fact.

 

Issue of 05/16/2018.

 

The investigation into the death of the Dyatlov group continues in the studio, a sensational statement has already been aired that Semyon Zolotaryov, the most mysterious participant in the ill-fated expedition, could have been involved in the death of the Dyatlov group.

 

Perhaps he was an agent implanted in a group of students at the very last moment, and was rescued by special services right after the tragedy.

 

Who is then buried in the grave of Zolotaryov?

 

 

FROM THE AUTHORS

 

Honestly, we were not ready for such an unexpected conclusion of the examination.

 

After all, if Semyon Zolotaryov is not buried at the Ivanovskoe Cemetery in Yekaterinburg, then who?

 

And where did Zolotaryov go from the scene of the tragedy?

 

Or where did the body of Semyon Zolotaryov go?

 

Julia is right that you need to contact the authorities with these questions, but we have so far asked her to wait.

 

In the near future, we will conduct a more extensive DNA analysis at the Russian Forensic Center, where specialists will compare the DNA of the sister and brother - Pavel Leshchenko and Tatyana Skulbeda, to make sure of their kinship.

 

And then they will compare the bone DNA of the alleged Semyon Zolotaryov and his both nephews.

 

In addition, we hope that other relatives of Semyon will agree to submit their samples for more accurate analysis.

 

But if the second examination also confirms the conclusion of the first, then the picture of the events on the pass will be even more mysterious and will require direct investigation by the competent authorities.

 

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

 

 

[fortyck]

Semyon Zolotaryov second DNA results show a match, but can not exclude his brother Nikolay.

 

In the Russian Center of Forensic Expertise of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation the analysis of the remains of the most mysterious participant of a fateful expedition has come to the end.

 

All rights belong to Komsomolskaya Pravda.
Authors Nikolay Varsegov and Natalya Varsegova.

Photocorrespondent Alexey Bulatov

 

The first test took place in May

 

In winter 1959 in the mountains of the Northern Urals, nine tourists disappeared under the leadership of Igor Dyatlov.

 

A month later the rescuers discovered their cut tent.

 

And in a radius of one and a half kilometers from it - five frozen bodies.

 

The bodies of the rest were found only in May.

 

Almost all the tourists were stripped and half-dressed.

 

Some have fatal injuries.

 

It is still unclear why the hikers ran away into the freezing cold to their own death.

 

The oldest participant in the fatal expedition was the 37-year-old front-line soldier Semyon Zolotaryov.

 

We have written more than once about him, as well as why we decided to exhume his grave.

 

Let's just remind you that according to the memories of relatives, during his life Semyon didn't have on his body any tattoos that the forensic scientist discovered at the autopsy.

 

In addition, the face of the deceased on the pass, and designated as Semyon Zolotaryov, was unrecognizable.

 

Therefore, there are still doubts whether they buried him under the monument to Semyon Zolotaryov?

 

In addition, the burial place of Zolotaryov was not noted at all in the register of cemeteries in Yekaterinburg.

 

That is, according to the documents, he was not buried in this city.

 

This prompted Semyon's relatives to ask the "KP" to exhume and establish kinship with the help of DNA expertise.

 

Semyon Zolotaryov - the most mysterious member of Dyatlov group

 

Semyon Zolotaryov - the most mysterious member of Dyatlov group

 

SURPISING RESULTS

 

The first test was conducted in May.

 

Geneticist Alexei Garkovenko aired the sensational results on Channel 1: "Close relationship between the person buried in the grave and relatives of Semyon Zolotaryov is excluded".

 

We admit that results really took us by surprise.

 

We decided to conduct second analysis.

 

But this time not in a private laboratory, but at the Russian Forensic Medical Examination Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (RC SME).

 

The head of the research, Professor, Doctor of Biological Sciences, laureate of the State Prize of Russia, Pavel Ivanov, expert of the Russian Academy of Sciences, commented on the results.

 

It was he who more than 20 years ago developed and introduced into the expert practice the methodology of DNA research.

 

- Pavel Leonidovich, for the testing on Semyon Zolotaryov we use the radius bone and the time of the exhumation it passed several hands.

 

Could a foreign biological material transfer on it and interfere with the DNA testing of the bone?

 

- During the testing, the surface of the bone is removed, and it is unlikely that something has got inside.

 

This is improbable.

 

Everything is washed off, removed, and the material is taken from within.

 

The material is then ground using appropriate apparatus.

 

The result is thin bone powder.

 

This is done in order to increase the surface of the object for genetic testing, DNA.

 

We need as much material as we can possibly extract.

 

It's like coffee.

 

Coffee is grinded before brewing.

 

If you put whole grains in boiling water, you, of course, will get something there, but not enough.

 

Same thing here - the thinner the powder, the higher the yield of genetic material.

 

Alleged grave of Semyon of Zolotaryov

 

There are a lot of subtleties.

 

For example, bone splitting should not heat up, otherwise the genetic material will begin to disintegrate.

 

It is already exposed to bacteria in the earth, all kinds of salts, solutions.

 

The bone received by the "Komsomolskaya Pravda" during the exhumation is a difficult object.

 

Therefore, we prepared eight samples from it to see the reproducibility of the result, its regularity.

 

How many times will the same combination be repeated.

 

Such analyzes are high technologies, they should be handled by qualified people.

 

And not the students (those who read a lot but learned the material superficially - Auth.).

 

Who roughly represent what to compare, but do not know the laws of the genre.

 

They could misinterpret some fact.

 

- Did all eight samples produce usable results?

 

- Some did not work at all.

 

The biological material was destroyed.

 

But from two samples of the bone it was possible to obtain the same genotype.

 

And then he was compared to the genotype of Zolotaryov's relatives.

 

By the way, I saw the result of the first testing - there is very bad data.

 

That complex of features, which the expert described, did not reflect anything at all.

 

- Please explain.

 

- You have a color portrait.

 

And there is a television image of the same person with strong interference, as on an old TV set.

 

So the inexperienced specialist says: "I see the face.

 

It has a vertical oval, a straight nose. "

 

And in the picture with a defect, he sees a crooked face, a curved nose, and on the side of the compression.

 

And concludes: "Of course, these are different people".

 

But you need to understand: you can not make a comparison with these data, they are simply unsuitable for work.

 

Well, if the expert does not understand this, he will say: "Yes, these are two different people."

 

The same thing happens with genetic traits.

 

They are localized in chromosomes and are manifested in a certain way.

 

The expert studies, as it were, their virtual image, which is set by technology.

 

But it is not enough to get this image, it is important to be able to work with it.

 

Workers open the grave

 

I'm not saying that these experts deliberately try to deceive someone.

 

This, in my opinion, indicates that a person as a whole understands the process, but does not understand in details.

 

This is very often observed in forensics.

 

And because of this illiterate work, the investigation is crumbling.

 

Criminals remain at large or, conversely, innocent people go to prison.

 

So called experts, I think, you just need to sweep through with a broom.

 

But this is difficult.

 

PROBABILITY OF KINSHIP IS ALMOST 100 PERCENT

 

- Research on kinship is conducted on chromosomal (Y) DNA or on mitochondrial DNA*.

 

In our case, which one was done?

 

- Mitochondrial DNA.

 

The object itself is so bad that it is much more difficult to establish the chromosome sign in it than the mitochondrial ones, which are a thousand times larger in the cell.

 

- There is an opinion that the comparison on the mitochondrial basis is not entirely reliable.

 

- This is not entirely true.

 

Mitochondrial DNA, in contrast to chromosomal DNA, does not characterize the individual, but characterizes its genetic line, because it remains unchanged in a series of generations.

 

That is, the child will have exactly the same mitochondrial DNA as the mother.

 

The mother has exactly the same mitochondrial DNA as her mother.

 

But exactly the same DNA can also be found in an outsider.

 

For example, one for 10 thousand people.

 

- Does that mean they're related?

 

- No.

 

Let's say you have blood type II.

 

And the stranger from the street is the same.

 

Is he your relative?

 

No.

 

He is another person with the same characteristic.

 

- And in our case what are the chances of a stranger to have same characteristics?

 

- The conclusion says: "The probability of kinship is 99.66-99.84 percent."

 

Approximately one person per ten thousand.

 

- Is that why you question the research on the method of mitochondrial DNA?

 

- This is the reason.

 

But these studies are still considered reliable, since it is difficult to assume that a man with the same DNA got into the grave with the name of of Semyon Zolotaryov.

 

In addition, in your case, maternal analysis is the only possible way.

 

After all, the relationship was established: uncle - nephews.

 

A study of chromosomal (nuclear) DNA allows you to establish kinship only at a very close genetic distance: parents and children, siblings.

 

The forensic expert is undertaking an examination

 

The forensic expert is undertaking an examination

 

- There is a version that the brother of Semyon Zolotaryov - Nikolay could impersonate his brother.

 

- The genetic test performed will not give an answer.

 

They are siblings with the same structure of mitochondrial DNA.

 

- And if we had provided a sample of Semyon's son, could we say for sure that this is Semyon Zolotaryov?

 

- Yes.

 

But only if you can find a part with unbreakable chromosomal DNA of Semyon.

 

UNUSABLE RESULTS

 

- Why do the data of the second examination differ entirely from the first results?

 

- They could not get acceptable for analysis results, but gave out for acceptable what was unsuitable.

 

And got the wrong conclusion.

 

In other words, they processed one site, did not find any match in it, and stated that "there is no relationship".

 

But it was necessary to simply say: "Unfortunately, there is no data on this person that we could compare".

 

And they correctly defined the DNA of a living person (niece).

 

And during the re-examination we compared the results obtained from the bone with the niece's already ready results.

 

And they made the opposite conclusion.

 

 

FROM THE AUTHORS

 

Bottom line the second examination, this time conducted by such an authoritative scholar as Pavel Ivanov, showed that the DNA of the person buried under the sign "Semyon Zolotaryov" matches the DNA of his niece.

 

But this fact does not exclude the version of other researchers suspected that under the name of Semyon his brother Nikolay could be buried, who, according to archival documents, worked with the Germans and disappeared without a trace during the war.

 

Therefore, we can not yet put a end on this investigation.

 

 

REFERENCE «KP»

 

What is chromosomal DNA and mitochondrial DNA?

 

*Chromosomal DNA is a strictly male line.

 

A comparison is possible only among men.

 

Women do not have this DNA.

 

Mitochondrial DNA exists in both men and women.

 

In principle: all children of the same mother have the same mitochondrial genes.

 

Both boys and girls.

 

But in the next generation these genes will be given to their offspring only by girls.

 

The boys will also have offspring, but their children will have the genes of their mother, that is, a completely extraneous woman.

 

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

[fortyck]

Sasha - the baby that always broke his mother into tears

 

 

Emotional story by Galina Sazonova, Doctor pediatrician and Dyatlov case researcher

 

 

This article is the result Galina Sazonova's exhaustive detective work.

 

Until now, it was not known that a child had survived any of the victims.

 

The narrative starts as a matter of fact exposé but the author shows soon enough her sentiment to the characters involved and reveals her true feelings on the topic.

 

At the moment she is maybe the person who knows best Semyon Zolotaryov's background.

 

Galina Sazonova is deeply emotionally bound to keep going further. (ed. note)

 

Semyon's son Sasha is born on February 10, 1956, in Lermontovo, Russian Federation.

 

Semyon's wife's name is Tamara.

 

Her identity is known, but it is not published because her children still live in a small town and do not want attention from neighbors and gossip about their mother.

 

Tamara is not on any of the photographs shown here.

 

There are pictures of her, but they are not published yet.

 

She is very beautiful!

 

The type of woman that men fall head over heels.

 

Tamara has four daughters.

 

The eldest was born before Sasha, and three after.

 

Sasha would be the fifth child.

 

All the daughters were born out of wedlock and had the mother's surname.

 

With that, she had a second civil husband after Semyon, and they lived happily with him all his life, and all her children are very fond of him.

 

Tamara was very worried about Sasha her whole life.

 

She always began to cry from mentioning his name.

 

It was Her tragedy.

 

Her daughters always knew that there was a brother, this was not hidden from them, but the topic was not discussed in the family because there was a very painful reaction from her.

 

You can't start to imagine how intelligent, educated, tactful, and successful her daughters are.

 

They speak of their mother with a lot of love and compassion, admitting the fact that Sasha was given away and not understanding how this could happen.

 

This is not an antisocial family, and this is not the woman who is just so ready to give up her child.

 

She did everything she could to raise beautiful daughters.

 

Tamara and her second husband were looking for Sasha.

 

The eldest daughter remembers the moment when all in tears, Tamara carried Sasha.

 

He was about a year old.

 

She put him on the porch of a house and hid the girl in bushes so that she would be on the lookout Sasha not to fall from the porch or crawl away.

 

The door opened, Sasha was taken.

 

It was a private house.

 

The daughter is sure that it was Semyon's house and that Semyon's mother opened the door.

 

Before this happened, Tamara and Semyon quarreled, and he left.

 

The daughter didn't like Semyon, although she remembers him well.

 

She doesn't remember any tattoos.

 

He was strict with her, but at the same time, she doesn't mention any violence towards her (raising a hand or verbal abuse).

 

But she remembers very well how he forced her to eat all her food.

 

This was very typical after the war.

 

I couldn't stand my grandma because my sister and I could not leave the table until we finished it all, including crumbs of bread, which fell on the table.

 

My grandmother survived the siege of Leningrad from the first to the last day.

 

Only later did I understand why she did what she did.

 

Semyon, aged 11, survived the Holodomor and the famine of 1945-46.

 

Tamara loved Semyon very much.

 

At the same time, she hated him her whole life.

 

Tamara also fought during the war.

 

This is what is known from Tamara's daughters.

 

It is clear that all memories can be smoothed, especially childhood memories.

 

Even more the daughters will protect their mother because they love her.

 

Now looking at it objectively hear is what I do not understand.

 

Everything happened in a very small village of Lermontovo, also closed to outsiders, since uranium was extracted on its territory.

 

All those who came to work in this city were investigated.

 

The village was recently founded, and everyone lived in barracks.

 

Those in one longhouse have many rooms and one family (no matter how many people) lives in one room.

 

All have a shared toilet, a corridor, a kitchen.

 

There are many neighbors.

 

I don't understand how it is possible to explain to the neighbors where did the child go.

 

Neighbors could not help but notice.

 

The same goes for the Semyon's family, how could the child disappear without anybody noticing, they lived in barracks too.

 

At that time in the Soviet Union, the children were looked at very fondly (they were a great asset), especially in the territories that were occupied by the Germans.

 

You might not know, but in the village of Udobnoy, where Semyon is from, there was a German hospital for which children were selected, their blood was pumped out, and their bodies were thrown into a pit behind the hospital.

 

After liberation, they found in the ground bodies of women, with bullet holes in their heads, embracing their children.

 

A child at that time was considered sacred.

 

One would wonder why is Semyon in the photos surrounded by women.

 

Because there were no men (muzhiks).

 

Twenty-five million men of childbearing age perished.

 

There was an extreme demographic bias.

 

Women did not hope to get married, but they wanted to have children at least.

 

Therefore, at that time, there was a government decree, on the support of single mothers financially.

 

Perhaps this is the reason why none of Tamara's daughters had an official father and why Semyon was not put on the birth certificate.

 

Tamara received money for this under a program that stimulates fertility.

 

They all lived very poorly.

 

It is now difficult for us to imagine how difficult it was back then to make ends meet.

 

Considerations to understand the time and place:

 

• The rejection of the child threatened Tamara to be condemned by society. A strong condemnation could end up with dismissal from work. That didn't happen. She had to have a "storefront" story for neighbors and colleagues.
• The legal moment. Not only that she gave up the child, but she had to make out a number of legal documents - to write him out from the place of living, from the kindergarten, from the children's polyclinic, and so on. Everywhere she to give some reason, why is she doing it. There was very strict control at the time.
• If she gave him up to an orphanage and relinquished her rights of a parent - the condemning information had to be sent to her place of work and there she had to be reproved at meetings of the work collective and, as a rule, became immediately known to the whole community. And there was always a woman nearby who couldn't have a child or husband. But then the child could be quickly adopted.
• If she didn't relinquish her rights of a parent but simply abandoned the child somewhere, then this child was transferred to an orphanage, but was listed as "lost". There was a search for parents, and it could last a lifetime until the child grew up. Such children were kept in the orphanage. They could not be given up for adoption because orphanhood was not confirmed, and there was no relinquishment of the rights from the parents.

 

The most realistic option to bypass all legal and social difficulties was to give the child to be brought up in the village to some relatives.

 

It was allowed because life was difficult.

 

But the thing is that if she gave Sasha to Semyon's mom or Semyon himself, it was impossible to live in one small village and not meet with her son.

 

So Sasha was clearly taken from Lermontovo.

 

And if Tamara wanted to search for him, she wouldn't know where to look.

 

Now there was information from Semyon's niece, Alla Borovikovskaya, that when they were looking for Sasha, they were told "you can't find him, he is in Germany".

 

I'm not very sure that there was cross-border adoption at that time, so most likely, they are talking of Soviet citizens who worked or served in Germany at that time.

 

Those who had the right to live there as families were few.

 

There is a hope that this can be reflected in some archives in Germany, lists of diplomatic workers, or military specialists.

 

The problem is that if Sasha was adopted at the age of one year, he could completely change his name and even his date of birth.

 

And he may not even know about the fact that he is adopted.

 

Although at that time, it was not normal to hide this information from the child.

 

Too many children were adopted, and it was considered normal.

 

Alla Borovikovskaya is a foster child in Zolotaryov's family herself.

 

The next day after the exhumation, I was alone in the cemetery.

 

The sun was shining, although it was cold.

 

I went to church, put a candle for Semyon, and, waiting for the car, just walked along the rows of graves.

 

I heard a bell chiming.

 

And suddenly, I had a revelation that I had to find Semyon's son and make him come to the grave of his father.

 

Semyon needs this, he is asking for it.

 

It was like a bright light behind my eyes in contrast to the darkness of the grave I was staring all day long.

 

There are many theories about Semyon.

 

It so happened that no one knows about him as much as I do.

 

He was a complicated man with a very uneasy fate, but at the same time, I have a strong feeling that he was an extraordinarily decent and kind person.

 

I can talk indefinitely about Semyon.

 

Perhaps you have heard enough for the time being.

 

Galina Sazonova

 

Source →

 

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

[fortyck]

𝗗𝗬𝗔𝗧𝗟𝗢𝗩 𝗣𝗔𝗦𝗦

 

In 2024 we will feature a new photo every Monday.

 

This one is taken by Petr Kozlov

 

 

#dyatlovpass #1079book

 

 

 

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

[fortyck]

𝗔𝗣𝗥𝗜𝗟 𝟭𝟲

 

The results from the tent are back

 

 

#dyatlovpass #1079book

 

 

ACT № 199 Forensic expertise on the tent

 

 

 

Written on April 16, 1959.

The case of the death of student tourists from Dyatlov group.

 

April 3, 1959 from the Prosecutor's Office of Sverdlovsk region under the order of 16 / III-59. criminal prosecutor Jr. Justice Adviser Ivanova L.N. for the production of forensic examination entered the tourist tent of the Dyatlov group, found at the scene.

 

The following problems are assigned to the expertise:

1. Is Dyatlov group tent cut?
2. If yes, are the cuts made from inside or outside?

 

The production of this expertise was entrusted to the expert-criminalist Churkina H. E. with a higher legal education and experience as an expert in the field since 1954.

 

The expert has been warned on criminal liability under articles 92 and 95 of the RSFSR Criminal Code.

 

Circumstance of the case

 

February 1, 1959 on the slopes of Mount "1079" а group of tourists consisting of 9 people met their tragic death.

 

The group suddenly abandoned the tent.

 

The investigation has reason to believe that the tent was cut by someone.

 

Inspection and investigation

 

Camping tent of a group of tourists under the direction of Dyatlov, found on the scene, presented for research in a disorderly-crumpled form.

 

To recreate the situation close to the situation of the scene, with the help and advice of the tourist Yudin Y., the tent in question was pitched and reinforced in such a way as it is usually arranged by the hikers when camping /see example scheme №1/.

 

photo №1

 

The tent is made of thick cotton fabric of protective color.

 

The total length of the tent /by the top seam/ is 4m.33 cm, the length of the side is 1 m.

 

14 cm, the total width is about 2 m.

 

The height of the tent depends on its installation.

 

From the left end of the tent there is a hole that serves as an entrance.

 

This hole is formed by two non-sewn halves of the fabric and from the inside is creped with a white sheet.

 

From the right end there is a small round hole sewn in the form of a sleeve and intended for ventilation.

 

From the side edges on the tent attached loops with twine, serving to strengthen it.

 

There is no twine at the end of the right skate.

 

The tent is worn down.

 

When inspecting the tent, it is established that on its surface there are numerous damages, especially on the right slant of the canopy forming the roof /see scheme №1/.

 

With a careful examination of these damages, it is established that some of them /and in particular conditionally marked damages №1,2,3/ have a completely different nature compared to all the other damages that are on the tent.

 

The edges of these three lesions have even, not elongated ends of the threads, are damaged at different angles, breaking both the weft threads and the warp threads.

 

All woven items /unlike jersey, leather etc./, despite a sharp difference in appearance /raw material, thickness, surface character/ always consist of 3 systems of threads - warp and weft, interwoven perpendicular to each other.

 

The damage resulting from tears usually follows the line of least resistance, i.e. tear either the threads of the weft, or the warp threads.

 

Such damage is usually very smooth and has right angles.

 

The cut, under any conditions, always disrupts both those and other threads at different angles randomly.

 

Cut only either the threads of the weft, or the warp threads is almost impossible. /see scheme №2 /.

 

photo №2

 

As a result of the foregoing, and when examining the edges of all the damages on the tent, one can conclude that three damages /conditionally marked № 1, 2, 3 / came as a result of contact with some sharp weapon /knife/, i.e. are cuts.

 

Yet the rest of the damage is a tear.

 

photo №3

 

Damage # 1 is shaped in the form of a broken straight line, its total length is 32 cm.

 

Above it there is a small puncture of the tissue in 2 cm.

 

The corners of the hole are torn. /see photo №4 /.

 

photo №4

 

Damage # 2 and 3 have a non-uniform arcuate shape.

 

The approximate length of these lesions is 89 cm and 42 cm. from the right edge of damage # 2 and from both edges of damage # 3 there are no cloth flaps and it is possible that they had their continuation further.

 

In order to determine from which side the indicated cuts were made (from the inner one - from the tent or from the outside), a thorough microscopic examination of the edges of the cuts of the adjacent tissue sections was made / zoom level from 0.6 to 56X / .

 

As a result of the conducted studies it was found that from the inside of the tent in the areas of the cuts close to the edges there are surface damages of the fabric in the form of minor punctures, incisions of the fabric threads and very thin scratches. /see photo № 5-13 /.

 

photos №5 and 6

 

photo №7

 

photo №12

 

All scratches and punctures are rectilinear.

 

Scratches are observed in the surface damage of the filaments: the filaments are either cut in half / see photo № 10 /, or with them the dye is simply scratched off and not the colored parts are visible / see photo № 5, 6, 11 /.

 

photo №10 and 11

 

At the corners of the punctures, on the inside of the tent / unlike the outer tent, there are, as it were, continuations of damage, which are expressed in the form of thin scratches. /see photo № 8, 9 /.

 

photo №8 and 9

 

The nature and shape of all these injuries indicate that they were formed from the contact of the fabric of the inner side of the tent with the blade of some weapon /knife/.

 

All of the above indicates that the existing incisions are made from the inside, from the tent.

 

CONCLUSION

 

In the camping tent of Dyatlov group on the right slant of the canopy forming the roof, three damages of approximately 32, 89, and 42 cm in length /conditionally numbered 1, 2, 3 / are made with some sharp weapon /knife/ i.e. are cuts.

 

All these cuts are done on the inside of the tent.

 

SR. RESEARCH ASSOCIATE Churkina - signature /CHURKINA/

 

 

 

You can see the originals here →

In Russian →

 

More information on the tent →

 

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

[fortyck]

Questions about the tent

 

What was the mode of closing of the tent - buttons (пуговицы), straps?

 

Some sources say that the tent was found fastened and only two of the lower buttons were unfastened.

 

I can't find a document that says so.

 

Found an interview with Slobtsov from 6 May 2015 which doesn't make it any clearer.

In the case files it says "From the left end of the tent there is a hole that serves as an entrance.

 

This hole is formed by two non-sewn halves of the fabric and from the inside is creped with a white sheet."

 

("С левого торца палатки имеется отверстие, служащее дверью.

 

Указаное отверстие образовано двумя не сшитыми половинками ткани и с внутренней стороны задрепировано белой простынью.")

 

Nothing more on the closing and how it was found, fastened (with what?) or not.

 

~ If Zolotaryov and Tibo went out to pee, saw something in the sky, Zolotaryov went back for his camera and called the rest to see the light show in the sky, that is why they were with no shoes and Tibo and Zolotrayov were wearing valenki.

 

But if the tent was fastened, I don't see the perpetrators going in and bother to fasten the tent unless they spend time inside and didn't want to be cold, which is far fetched.

 

Dyatlov group tent mode of closing was with wooden toggles, but we don't have any clue if they were fastened or not

 

Answer:
The only reliable fact is that the tent had buttons, but special ones - wooden toggles (клеванты).

 

All other things - was the tent fastened or not etc. are just the wild guesses.

 

Was the tent cut on the other side?

 

Alex KAN tent interpretation

 

Are the cuts really see through?

 

Where that many tears on the back of the tent that we don't see?

 

Is there a document about this? Source

~ If they allegedly cut the tent to escape there is no reason to cut it on both sides, not to this extend.

 

Answer:
Case file says “ When inspecting the tent, it is established that on its surface there are numerous damages, especially on the right slant of the canopy forming the roof /see scheme №1/. “

 

( “При осмотре данной палатки установлено, что на её поверхности имеются многочисленные повреждения , особенно на правом скосе полотна, образующего крышу /см.схему №1/. “)

 

The word especially implies that were some cuts on the other side too, just not as many.

 

Was the tent tampered with?

 

This photo is not from 1959, just visualizing my question.

 

Social media postings hard to link to build theories on the "fact" that the skis under the tent were not positioned properly i.e. were the wrong side up which would testify to the doctoring of the scene.

 

Answer:
Nothing suspicious.

 

On the contrary - testimonies from 1959 say that all was done quite professionally.

 

What happened to the tent?

 

Does the tent still exist?

 

Answer:
Head of Svredlovsk Forensic Science Laboratory K. P. Kretov kept the tent.

 

After Kretov died in the 80s the tent was taken to the garbage container, apparently water pipe burst back in the late 70s and the tent collected mold.

 

The storage policy for evidence as well as case files is that they can be destroyed 25 years after the case is closed.

 

Thank god the prosecutor of the Sverdlovsk region Vladislav Ivanovich Tuykov decided the case files not to be destroyed as “socially significant”, but this did not apply to evidence.

 

Some evidence were taken by relatives and later submitted to Dyatlov Foundation established in 1999, but not the tent.

 

Tuykov is now passed away, lets hope the case files don't have same fate as the tent.

 

How steep was the slope where the tent was pitched

 

original photograph

 

Official protocol report on the Dyatlov group tent:

"Tent site is located on the North- eastern slope of mountain 1079 (Kholat Syakhl official term) meters at the mouth of river Auspiya.

 

Tent site is located 300 meters from the top of the mountain 1079 with a slope of 30 °..."

 

Second read on the photos

Rescuers removed hikers belongings, folded the tent and carried them down the slope for the convenience of the subsequent evacuation.

 

From beneath the tent they removed three pairs of skis, two of which were given to the hunters Moiseev and Mostovoy that were transporting the items and one pair was used to mark the location of Dyatlov and Kolmogorova's bodies.

 

On the photos we can see captured this precise moment: the tent is completely disassembled and pushed to the side, out from under the skis of the hikers are removed, rescuers are moving down the slope.

 

 

 

The two people standing to the left are journalist Yuri Yarovoy and the prosecutor criminologist Lev Ivanov.

 

This photo is especially valuable because it allows us to measure the steepness of the slope of the mountain Kholat Syakhl right where the tent was pitched.

 

The original photograph is tilted to the left, but the standing straight figures of Yarovoy and Ivanov can be used as a reference points to straighten the photo and measure the slope which is only 15 degrees.

 

This is not more than the angle of climbing for stairs and escalators.

 

Why the group pitched their tent at this spot on the night of the incident

 

Theory 1
On January 31, the group arrived at the edge of a highland area and began to prepare for climbing.

 

In a wooded valley they cached surplus food and equipment that would be used for the trip back.

 

The following day (February 1), the hikers started to move through the pass.

 

It seems they planned to get over the pass and make camp for the next night on the opposite side, but because of worsening weather conditions–snowstorms and decreasing visibility–they lost their direction and deviated west, up towards the top of Kholat Syakhl.

 

When they realized their mistake, the group decided to stop and set up camp there on the slope of the mountain, rather than moving 1.5 km (0.93 mi) downhill to a forested area which would have offered some shelter from the elements.

 

Yudin, the lone survivor, postulated that "Dyatlov probably did not want to lose the altitude they had gained, or he decided to practice camping on the mountain slope. "

 

Theory 2
It is judged, based on the weather information available, what had been written in their journals and on information about the group's progress by Yuri Yudin, that they would have reached the slopes of Kholat Syakhl sometime in the afternoon of 1 Feb.

 

At that latitude and time of year sunset is 1658, so it can be reasonably assumed that they got to the point were they pitched tent 60 minutes or so before then in order to give them time to erect the tent in daylight.

 

Their final destination was Mount Otorten, and it was not feasible for them to have continued on at night.

 

We can never know precisely why Dyatlov ordered the tent pitched were he did, but I doubt it was because they were lost.

 

They were in fact on the correct route to Otorten.

 

Also, if they managed to find their way about 1,500m to the treeline in the dark and in some difficulty after leaving the tent in a panic, they why could they not find their way to the treeline in daylight, and in good order?

 

It must be presumed, without evidence to the contrary, that Dyatlov had intended to pitch the tent on the slopes of Kholat Syakhl.

 

It is of course speculation that this was to give the group an extra challenge.

 

Another factor is that when dawn broke, their destination, Mount Otorten, would be visible from their tent.

 

This, after a difficult journey, would be good for moral as they could see their destination.

 

This of course is speculation, but I do not believe they were lost and bumbling about.

 

And to re-iterate, if they were lost, why could they make it to the treeline in the dark in a panic, and not in daylight in good order.

 

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

[fortyck]

"EXPERTS CAN NOT BE BLAMED FOR ANYTHING!"

 

https://dyatlovpass.com/igor-makushkin?fbclid=IwAR0f9R1rjJ0YcTTfVHQl18WjuXR5uXltEh9AkNZr-hWAU9A6LS1LeGm0o9Y

 

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

[fortyck]

𝗔𝗣𝗥𝗜𝗟 𝟭𝟲

 

Forensic analysis confirmed the cuts were indeed made from inside.

 

The examination was conducted in Sverdlovsk Forensic Laboratory 3-16 April 1959 by senior forensic expert Genrietta Eliseevna Churkina.

 

https://dyatlovpass.com/case-files-303-304

 

 

#dyatlovpass #1079book

 

 

#dyatlovpass #1079book

The back of the chair is used as a measurement ruler. Some cuts were made when the tent was found. This one is made by Slobtsov. Read more: https://dyatlovpass.com/1959-search#the-tent
#dyatlovpass #1079book

#dyatlovpass #1079book

#dyatlovpass #1079book

#dyatlovpass #1079book

The piece of the tent material is covering at least one big hole that can not be measured. Read more: https://dyatlovpass.com/1959-search#the-tent
#dyatlovpass #1079book

 

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

[fortyck]

𝗔𝗣𝗥𝗜𝗟 𝟭𝟲

 

Forensic analysis confirmed the cuts were indeed made from inside.

 

The examination was conducted in Sverdlovsk Forensic Laboratory 3-16 April 1959 by senior forensic expert Genrietta Eliseevna Churkina.

 

https://dyatlovpass.com/case-files-303-304

 

 

#dyatlovpass #1079book

 

 

 

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

[fortyck]

𝟱𝘁𝗵 𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗳𝘁 𝗨𝗣𝗜 𝗔𝗽𝗿𝗶𝗹 𝟭𝟳-𝟮𝟳

 

The groups of Blinov, Potapov/Kuzminov, and Starikovskiy.

 

Chernyshev is in charge.

 

This is the only known photo from this shift.

 

Mansi at the pass next to the pyramid.

 

According to Yakimenko this pyramid was installed in the area of the landing site in April 1959, after the 3rd shift of searchers.

 

The design for the pyramid could be seen in Maslennikov's notebook who left the search on March 10.

 

This same pyramid is later mounted on the top of the outlier rock (aka Boot rock) that is the landmark of the Dyatlov Pass in modern days.

 

#dyatlovpass #1079book

 

 

#dyatlovpass #1079book

The design for the pyramid could be seen in Maslennikov's notebook who left the search on March 10.
https://dyatlovpass.com/maslennikov-notebook-2
#dyatlovpass #1079book

This same pyramid is later mounted on the top of the outlier rock (aka Boot rock) that is the landmark of the Dyatlov Pass in modern days.
#dyatlovpass #1079book

 

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

[fortyck]

In 2024 we will feature a new photo every Monday.

 

This one is taken by Andrey Gavrilov

 

 

#dyatlovpass #1079book

 

 

 

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

[fortyck]

𝗬𝗨𝗥𝗜 𝗬𝗘𝗙𝗜𝗠𝗢𝗩𝗜𝗖𝗛 𝗬𝗨𝗗𝗜𝗡

 

July 19, 1937 - April 27, 2013

 

Died at age 75 from rheumatic heart disease.

 

 

https://dyatlovpass.com/yuri-yudin

 

 

 

#dyatlovpass #1079book

 

 

 

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9