Tragedia na Przełęczy Diatłowa (1 luty 1959 r.)

**fortyck** · 6 Stycznia

If you want to learn more about the Mansi, the big picture, scroll down where it says 𝗪𝗵𝗼 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗠𝗮𝗻𝘀𝗶 𝗮𝗻𝘆𝘄𝗮𝘆?

#dyatlovpass #1079book

https://dyatlovpass.com/bizzo?fbclid=IwAR1QgHQ8_TpOKYgSV8PdWbEuBSA_4t_LmFEpkwt_azauyInmXo-5_hptzow

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

**fortyck** · 6 Stycznia

My big announcement is back on for 𝗝𝗔𝗡 𝟵, 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟰.

#dyatlovpass #1079book

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

**fortyck** · 8 Stycznia

In 2024 we will feature a new photo every Monday.

This one is courtesy of Gora-club.ru

https://gora-club.ru/travel/pereval-dyatlova

#dyatlovpass #1079book

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

**fortyck** · 8 Stycznia

On January 8, 1959, the route commission of the Sverdlovsk city committee for physical culture and sports, chaired by Vasiliy Korolyov, an engineer of the UPI Department of Physics and Technology, approved the project of a trek for a group of hikers led by Igor Dyatlov along the route of the 3rd category of difficulty: Vizhay village, Sverdlovsk Region – 2nd Northern settlement – Otorten – Oyko Chakur - Toshemka River - Vizhay village (see case file 202 below).

Members of the Commission were experienced mountaineers Evgeniy Maslennikov and Victor Bogomolov.

They had no doubts about the qualifications of the Dyatlov group.

As of the date of approval of the expedition project, the team included fifth year students Igor Dyatlov and Zinaida Kolmogorova; fourth year students Lyudmila Dubinina, Aleksander Kolevatov, Yuri Doroshenko, Yuri Yudin, Vladislav Bienko and Yuri Vishnevskiy; and UPI graduates Rustem Slobodin, Georgiy Krivonischenko, Nikolay Thibeaux-Brignolle, Nikolay Popov and Yuri Verhoturov.

𝗧𝗛𝗜𝗥𝗧𝗘𝗘𝗡 people in all (see case file 201).

#dyatlovpass #1079book

Project plan for the expedition of Dyatlov group
https://dyatlovpass.com/case-files-199-208
#dyatlovpass #1079book

Project plan for the expedition of Dyatlov group
https://dyatlovpass.com/case-files-199-208#200
#dyatlovpass #1079book

Project plan for the expedition of Dyatlov group
https://dyatlovpass.com/case-files-199-208#201
#dyatlovpass #1079book

Project plan for the expedition of Dyatlov group
https://dyatlovpass.com/case-files-199-208#202
#dyatlovpass #1079book

Project plan for the expedition of Dyatlov group
https://dyatlovpass.com/case-files-199-208#203
#dyatlovpass #1079book

Project plan for the expedition of Dyatlov group
https://dyatlovpass.com/case-files-199-208#204
#dyatlovpass #1079book

Project plan for the expedition of Dyatlov group
https://dyatlovpass.com/case-files-199-208#205
#dyatlovpass #1079book

Project plan for the expedition of Dyatlov group
https://dyatlovpass.com/case-files-199-208#206
#dyatlovpass #1079book

Project plan for the expedition of Dyatlov group
https://dyatlovpass.com/case-files-199-208#207
#dyatlovpass #1079book

Project plan for the expedition of Dyatlov group
https://dyatlovpass.com/case-files-199-208#207back
#dyatlovpass #1079book

Project plan for the expedition of Dyatlov group
https://dyatlovpass.com/case-files-199-208#208
#dyatlovpass #1079book

Project plan for the expedition of Dyatlov group
https://dyatlovpass.com/case-files-199-208#208back
#dyatlovpass #1079book

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

**fortyck** · 9 Stycznia

𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗕𝗜𝗚 𝗡𝗘𝗪𝗦

A 10m tall cedar lying on the ground 5m away from where the bodies of Doroshenko and Krivonischneko were found was analyzed by an expert dendrologist Assoc. Prof. PhD Momchil Panayotov and the last ring is from 1958.

In the photos from February 1959, this tree is already on the ground, covered with snow, so much that it can not be seen.

The dating shows the tree fell after the end of 1958 and before the first bodies of the Dyatlov group were found.

#dyatlovpass #1079book

Location of the fallen cedar relative to the bodies found in 1959
#dyatlovpass #1079book

A dead cedar 10m tall lay 5m from the bodies of Doroshenko and Krivonichenko
#dyatlovpass #1079book

The tree died after 1958, and on the photos from February 1959 it is already covered with snow.
#dyatlovpass #1079book

A broken branch is the only thing in the way of the fallen cedar.
#dyatlovpass #1079book

The tree had to recover and made a smaller ring in 1959.
#dyatlovpass #1079book

The cedar was uprooted.
#dyatlovpass #1079book

The broken branch was not used in the fire.
#dyatlovpass #1079book

Dubinina, Zolotaryov and Thibeaux-Brignolle's broken ribs and skull could be very well explained with a fallen tree.
#dyatlovpass #1079book

Sidney Harris cartoon

Sidney Harris cartoon adaptation for the Dyatlov pass.
Characters resemble Buyanov and Borzenkov on purpose.
#dyatlovpass #1079book

First days of March 1959, red arrow pointing where the fallen cedar is.
#dyatlovpass #1079book

May 1959
#dyatlovpass #1079book

August 1963
#dyatlovpass #1079book

The dead cedar
#dyatlovpass #1079book

Dating the dead cedar
#dyatlovpass #1079book

The branch that the cedar broke when falling.
#dyatlovpass #1079book

The branch that the cedar broke when falling. Dating shows 1959.
#dyatlovpass #1079book

The branch that the cedar broke when falling.
#dyatlovpass #1079book

None of this would've been possible if it wasn't for Assoc. Prof. PhD Momchil Panayotov from the Dendrology department of the University of Forestry, Sofia, Bulgaria. He is also head of the Bulgarian Extreme Freeride Ski Association and member of the Mountain Search and Rescue. Maybe the most important quality concerning the Dyatlov case, after being an expert in both dendrology and avalanches, is that he is not partial to any theory. He was checking his findings multiple times and providing me results with complete objectivity.

"1079. The Overwhelming Force of Dyatlov Pass" was nominated for the "Russian Detective - 2023" award in the category "Documentary Detective". The audience voting is now underway. Since it requires an account in one of the Russian social media we are mainly appealing to the Russian followers. You can still visit though. It is a great achievement and honor for the authors. You can vote here → https://www.livelib.ru/detectiveawards/docdetectiv/2023

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

**fortyck** · 9 Stycznia

𝗦𝗘𝗘𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗙𝗢𝗥𝗘𝗦𝗧 𝗙𝗢𝗥 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗧𝗥𝗘𝗘𝗦

Read the whole article, there is more to it than meets the eye.

#dyatlovpass #1079book

https://dyatlovpass.com/dead-cedar?fbclid=IwAR0_ZRBs1G813uWOV0whNPs-j8iJ-qJdJXLvlH-WTNB3wgzQFaP4fxMC62I

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

**fortyck** · 10 Stycznia

I have been getting a lot of questions.

I will answer them all, I ask for patience and mercy.

Here is the first one: 𝗛𝗼𝘄 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗲 𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘀𝗲 𝗽𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲 𝗱𝗼 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝘀𝗲𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗻 𝘁𝗿𝗲𝗲?

1. Because 𝗶𝘁 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝗼𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗴𝗿𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝟮𝟳 𝗱𝗮𝘆𝘀, it didn't just fall.

The snow fall and drift for a month in the dead of winter down in the ravine can completely cover a fallen tree which was deep in the existing snow cover after the collapse to start with.

2. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗵𝗼𝘁𝗼𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗹𝗼𝗼𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗯𝗼𝗱𝗶𝗲𝘀.

So far, what they know is that the hikers left the tent and died from hypothermia.

Even if a tree was right there on top of the snow they would sit on it and discuss where to look for the missing bodies.

Askinadzi says they were working like robots, following orders, and we all know Lev Ivanov was out of his depth.

No one was looking around for anything else but bodies.

No one was securing and protecting the crime scene, taking notes and photos, and basically investigating.

No one took photos even of the bodies, so why would they notice a fallen tree under the snow?

3. All these photos are from before the bodies in the creek were found.

No one was looking for something that could have caused the injuries later described by Vozrozhdenniy in the autopsy reports.

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗮𝗷𝗼𝗿 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘂𝗺𝗮𝘀 𝗯𝗲𝗰𝗮𝗺𝗲 𝗽𝘂𝗯𝗹𝗶𝗰 𝗸𝗻𝗼𝘄𝗹𝗲𝗱𝗴𝗲 𝗼𝗻𝗹𝘆 𝗮𝗳𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗮𝘀𝗲 𝗳𝗶𝗹𝗲𝘀 𝘄𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗱𝗲𝗰𝗹𝗮𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗳𝗶𝗲𝗱.

Not even the parents knew about the crushed ribs and skull.

4. The photos from 1959 where the dead cedar can not be seen are the strongest evidence that 𝗶𝘁 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝗮𝗹𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱𝘆 𝗼𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗴𝗿𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱 𝗰𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝘀𝗻𝗼𝘄.

Otherwise it would be standing tall, as it's a 10m (33ft) tall cedar.

5. Even in modern days no one but me is interested in this or any other tree.

Researchers that visit the cedar regularly have known about this dead tree for decades.

Still, to this day, 𝗻𝗼 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝘄𝗮𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝗮𝗰𝗰𝗲𝗽𝘁 𝗲𝘃𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗵𝗲𝗮𝗿𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗴𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘀𝗽𝗶𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘆 𝘀𝗲𝗰𝗿𝗲𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘂𝗿𝘆, 𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝗯𝗲 𝗰𝗮𝘂𝘀𝗲𝗱 𝗯𝘆 𝘀𝗼𝗺𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝘀 𝘀𝗶𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗲 𝗮𝘀 𝗮 𝗳𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗻 𝘁𝗿𝗲𝗲.

I would call this intentional blindness (as opposed to inattentional blindness

https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-inattentional...).

#dyatlovpass #1079book

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

**fortyck** · 10 Stycznia

Next question: 𝗛𝗼𝘄 𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘆 𝗯𝗲 𝘀𝗼 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝗰𝗶𝘀𝗲 𝗼𝗻 𝘄𝗵𝗲𝗻 𝗶𝘁 𝗳𝗲𝗹𝗹? 𝗧𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗱𝗼𝗲𝘀𝗻'𝘁 𝘀𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱 𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁.

Answer: If "they" are the dendroligists, then the only thing "they" can say is the last year this tree lived i.e. 1958.

In our case the strange thing is that the tragedy happened in the first month of the next year after the tree died and the photos from the discovery of the first bodies do not show this tree standing up.

This is where the "precision" comes from.

We can narrow the time of death of the tree Jan 1-Feb 27. But on Feb 27 the fallen cedar was already completely covered with snow.

This is me concluding when the tree died, not "them".

"They" stop at "𝗮𝗳𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗗𝗲𝗰𝗲𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿 𝟯𝟭, 𝟭𝟵𝟱𝟴".

And, yes, dendrochronology can do this.

February 1959
#dyatlovpass #1079book

May 1959
#dyatlovpass #1079book

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

**fortyck** · 10 Stycznia

Here are all known search photos listed in the order they were taken.

#dyatlovpass #1079book

https://dyatlovpass.com/search-photos?fbclid=IwAR2tHPD_YxVxjDVzicFCsxnjH-EdwQxF6HVzi0TSZ4_r0VOeqQrjN1dEYUc

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

**fortyck** · 10 Stycznia

Question: I believe that with a living tree, or freshly cut one, the age of the tree can be determined accurately.

How is the age of a fallen tree, especially a when the year it fell is not actually known be determined?

Answer: We don't car about the age of the tree, only when it died.

Cross-dating in dendrochronology can do this because it doesn't count how many years lived but it "compares" (and this is very very simplified expression) the tree rings "widths" more like how they changed, and especially the same tree types in very close vicinity, and compares they rings with what we got.

In our case the center of the tree is rotten so we will never know how old it is, but in 2023 I cut a whole cross section from it and this is how Assoc. Prof. PhD Momchil Panayotov was able to find a line that has the outer (later) rings and the bark.

(... continued on the photos)

#dyatlovpass #1079book

We don't car about the age of the tree, only when it died. Cross-dating in dendrochronology can do this because it doesn't count how many years lived but it "compares" (and this is very very simplified expression) the tree rings "widths" more like how they changed, and especially the same tree types in very close vicinity, and compares they rings with what we got. In our case the center of the tree is rotten so we will never know how old it is, but in 2023 I cut a whole cross section from it and this is how Assoc. Prof. PhD Momchil Panayotov was able to find a line that has the outer (later) rings and the bark. #dyatlovpass #1079book

#dyatlovpass #1079book

This is only half of the work. You need to have a good sample from a living tree of the same type near by. I was very very lucky that a Russian researcher, also a dendrologist, had taken a core sample form the living cedar where the bodies were found in 2019. he mailed me this sample and I gave it to my dendrologist. All this is sanded and entered into a software. Nothing is done manually. The software decides how to assign the tree rings.
Here you can see the sample Sasha Konstantinov sent me from the living cedar...
#dyatlovpass #1079book

... as well as the hole that healed all well.
#dyatlovpass #1079book

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

**fortyck** · 12 Stycznia

𝗤𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻: If the tent was pitched in the forest, where are the three that were found on the slope going?

Are you making an assumption that they had seen illegal miners during the previous day and were trying to reach them?

𝗔𝗻𝘀𝘄𝗲𝗿: There was no such thing as illegal miners in 1959.

How can you mine illegally?

But yes, there were whole geologist cities nearby and when they were surveying by air, see the maps.

Also all the supplies and equipment were flown by air.

There are cases (I will post right after this one) when the pilots invited Dyatlov to fly over the area that they were going because he didn't have proper map.

The helicopters were typical for the area.

Now imagine something very bad happens in the ravine.

Where are you going to look for help?

Where are you heading to be seen?

#dyatlovpass #1079book

Northern Geological Expedition
https://dyatlovpass.com/northern-geological-expedition
#dyatlovpass #1079book

Results of actual measurements, including the area of height 1079, indicating the actual aircraft survey routes
https://dyatlovpass.com/aeromagnetic-survey-maps
#dyatlovpass #1079book

Results of actual measurements in the area of 1079
https://dyatlovpass.com/aeromagnetic-survey-maps
#dyatlovpass #1079book

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

**fortyck** · 12 Stycznia

NORTHERN GEOLOGICAL EXPEDITION

https://dyatlovpass.com/northern-geological-expedition?fbclid=IwAR0fnQW8WHMYgA_gIUSz8NVUWG4zIBdkSttg5Se9yqSZQjSxi6_anN-DXLo

#dyatlovpass #1079book

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

**fortyck** · 12 Stycznia

Published for the first time in "1079. The Overwhelming Force of Dyatlov Pass"

#dyatlovpass #1079book

AEROMAGNETIC SURVEY REPORTS AND MAPS 1959

https://dyatlovpass.com/aeromagnetic-survey-maps?fbclid=IwAR0MUnF_DsRCwfMVROvWzsoVamPZkJNuRRp607_W0F1tyrRnwwOL__ZhhC4

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

**fortyck** · 12 Stycznia

Pyotr Bartolomey, recollections 7 Feb 2015:

At that time there were no maps.

We went to the Polar Ural Expedition since we knew that they had maps scaled 1:100 000 (1cm=10km).

They asked us: "What, you are gonna sit here and retrace all day long?

Let us fly you along the route."

Akselrod with Dyatlov flew and circled the entire route.

On the way back to Kоzhim the pilot said: "There are 70 kilometers of tundra, practically there is no forest, you have to carry all the firewood on your back."

The other pilot said: "Why are you going to walk here?

We’ll drop you off on the other side of the ridge, but only we have to make two flights because it takes a full gas tank to get there [i.e. you are too heavy to fly all together].

Three people will fly in the first round and the other three will fly in the second."

And when they returned three people grabbed some backpacks, not their own, but they grabbed three backpacks, sat down and flew there and they were dropped on the other side.

When the aircraft returned the weather turned bad and 3 people, including Igor and me stayed for the next day.

The weather didn't clear for two days.

#dyatlovpass #1079book

1958 SUBPOLAR URAL

https://dyatlovpass.com/gallery-1958-Subpolar-Ural?fbclid=IwAR2mSHHjqYCTRCc7scT5ixL9c44ZJQphiFPolgUzFUJAHnbI3-Ab4vzxR4U

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

**fortyck** · 12 Stycznia

𝗤𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻: Geologists/miners - my understanding is that they had paid bribes to excavate minerals using explosives and weren’t following safety protocols.

Heading for a camp would make sense if Igor knew one was nearby, but wouldn’t the pilots who flew over the area regularly be aware of that too?

𝗔𝗻𝘀𝘄𝗲𝗿: No bribes.

They were not following any safety rules but that was normal.

Yet, they would have been found guilty, this is what they did back then, punish someone, problem solved.

They were not heading for a camp but the ridge to signal at the helicopters.

Helicopters fly low, and this is how they were found, their corpses, days after they died.

According to the standards in 1959 they had to lie down on the ground for the helicopters to know that there was an accident with injuries (pic.1)

https://studfile.net/preview/6154112/page:9/

#dyatlovpass #1079book

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

**fortyck** · 12 Stycznia

𝗤𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻: How is it possible that the Yuris can be seen in the snow and the huge tree under which they pulled out the tent and the dead is completely covered in snow and despite a lot of work there are no traces of it.

Where are the massive branches of the tree?

𝗔𝗻𝘀𝘄𝗲𝗿𝘀:

𝟭. The testimonies speak of lots of activity by the cedar.

This actually started theories that the hikers were blind, or crazy.

Here is what Krivonischenko's father says: "The searchers said that the fire at the cedar didn't go off due to lack of wood, but because nobody maintained it.

This, too, obviously could be either because people who were at the fire did not see what to do, or because they were already blind or dead.

They say that a few meters from the fire there were dry branches fallen from a tree that were not used.

In the presence of a fire, it was not possible not to see something that could be easily used, so being blind seems like a possible explanation." https://dyatlovpass.com/case-files-273-274#274

𝟮. Askinadzi says that there were traces they couldn't understand (but it was not their job to do so).

Here is the interview where this photo is from. https://dyatlovpass.com/askinadzi#3

𝟯. The fire supposedly Dyatlov group did was never reported to be covered with snow.

It was always seen even before the bodies.

𝟰. Now the toughest part of the question - where are the branches of the fallen cedar, why can't we see at least them.

What we can see from the photos in 1959 is really the bottom part of the trunk where there are no branches.

But even if there were branches, I still think that they would have been mostly under the snow.

Check the photo from May 1959.

You see the dead cedar and many more tangled trunks and branches and where are they in the photos in February-March when there is still snow?

The snow then is 2-3 meters at least.

In the photo from May I see a sticking up branch which is not visible on the February photo.

𝟱. Although standing tall the cedar was not healthy.

The center was rotten as we can see from the cores, and also one reason for the tree to fall could be that the branches on one side were larger than the other side and when the snow falls the weight would distribute unevenly and I have been told that this is a very frequent reason for the trees to fall.

That will make the branches at the top of the toppled tree the weaker branches.

Another evidence that the three was dangerous is that it didn't uproot with the roots but was severed at its base line to the ground.

This means that the cold ruptured many vessels and the healthy ones were not capable of supporting the weight of the dying giant.

Like the tree that fell on the street (in the photos from this post).

I am sure that this year when I go to the pass I will find the roots of the fallen cedar still in the ground.

... Also see my next two posts about the branches and broken trunks.

#dyatlovpass #1079book

Askinadzi says that there were traces they couldn't understand (but it was not their job to do so). Here is the interview where this photo is from. https://dyatlovpass.com/askinadzi#3
#dyatlovpass #1079book

February 1959
#dyatlovpass #1079book

May 1959
#dyatlovpass #1079book

Although standing tall the cedar was not healthy. The center was rotten as we can see from the cores, and also one reason for the tree to fall could be that the branches on one side were larger than the other side and when the snow falls the weight would distribute unevenly and I have been told that this is a very frequent reason for the trees to fall. That will make the branches at the top of the toppled tree the weaker branches. Another evidence that the three was dangerous is that it didn't uproot with the roots but was severed at its base line to the ground. This means that the cold ruptured many vessels and the healthy ones were not capable of supporting the weight of the dying giant. Like the tree that fell on the street. I am sure that this year when I go to the pass I will find the roots of the fallen cedar still in the ground.
#dyatlovpass #1079book

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

**fortyck** · 12 Stycznia

Because usually trees fall in winter due to the severe weather their trunks break.

Our tree was rotten so it just toppled.

Also there was mention of massive branches - look at these trees, their branches are like toothpicks.

#dyatlovpass #1079book

Look at the fallen cedar on the far right, it has no branches at all. #dyatlovpass #1079book

Look at the branches on these trees, do they seem massive to you? #dyatlovpass #1079book

Look at the branches on these trees, do they seem massive to you?
#dyatlovpass #1079book

Look at the branches on these trees, do they seem massive to you? #dyatlovpass #1079book

#dyatlovpass #1079book

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

**fortyck** · 13 Stycznia

Regarding the branches, even when the tree is healthy there not always massive branches like on the famous cedar.

He is a landmark, especially beautiful and can be seen from far away.

#dyatlovpass #1079book

This standing cedar has almost no branches. #dyatlovpass #1079book

This cedar is taller than the fallen cedar and I have taken a picture of the biggest branches on it which are not so big. #dyatlovpass #1079book

This is what a dead cedar with big branches should look like. This tree could be older than our fallen cedar, but our trunk is smooth, not a single stump. #dyatlovpass #1079book

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

**fortyck** · 14 Stycznia

𝗤𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻: Why do geologists build a whole new scene of the case and place two Jurkas 5m from the tree that killed the group thanks to their work?

When I create a new story and put so much work into it, I will also try to divert attention from what killed the group.

Couldn't they have guessed that the tree wouldn't be seen when they were pulling out the tent and the dead from under it?

𝗔𝗻𝘀𝘄𝗲𝗿: This case remains unsolved for 65 years because it is a mess.

Please bear with me while I try to explain our theory.

Every point below contributes to the whole puzzle.

If even one of these conditions was not present we wouldn't have this mystery to solve on our hands.

𝗦𝗵𝗼𝗿𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝘀𝘄𝗲𝗿: Because they didn't find all the bodies.

𝗟𝗼𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝗻𝘀𝘄𝗲𝗿: You make it sound as if some geologists found the tent under the tree, bodies laying around and thought right away "We are in trouble, lets cover this up."

It wasn't like that.

𝟭. They were not doing anything illegal.

The most valuable resource was uranium.

In case of checking a gamma anomaly, given the limited capabilities, the works might be done with a method borrowed from the practice of the leasing system of excavation of the radioactive ore by the MVD of the USSR in 1945-48, "𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘬𝘴 𝘸𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘥𝘶𝘤𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘰𝘴𝘵 𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘮𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘸𝘢𝘺 – 𝘣𝘺 𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘶𝘢𝘭 𝘴𝘩𝘰𝘳𝘵-𝘩𝘰𝘭𝘦 𝘥𝘳𝘪𝘭𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘨.

𝘕𝘦𝘹𝘵, 𝘣𝘭𝘢𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘰𝘶𝘵, 𝘤𝘰𝘭𝘭𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘴𝘪𝘧𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘩𝘭𝘰𝘱𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘦 – 𝘢 𝘱𝘪𝘵𝘤𝘩-𝘣𝘭𝘢𝘤𝘬 𝘶𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘶𝘮 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘭.

𝘈𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘢𝘨𝘯𝘦𝘵𝘪𝘤 𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘪-𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘬 𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘴 𝘸𝘦𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘶𝘱 𝘵𝘰 5 𝘬𝘨 𝘸𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘶𝘴𝘦𝘥 𝘢𝘴 𝘦𝘹𝘱𝘭𝘰𝘴𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘴."

Source: https://moi-goda.ru/.../zarosshie-tropi--sekretnaya...

𝟮. The people that found the bodies were workers, the thought for a cover up wouldn't cross their minds unless they did something wrong.

But they seem to have reported the incident which I don't think would happen if there was foul play.

The reason I deduce that they reported it is because according to Solters recollections 6 bodies were brought to the zone morgue in early February, and because there are official documents, at least 3 I have published that reflect an early investigation (February 6) and questioning about the wrong group (Shumkov's group), which means the early investigation which later merged into the Dyatlov case did not know who the dead hikers were.

The official investigation starting on February 26 was opened for the Dyatlov group.

So who were they investigating before that?

It sounds like the deaths were reported but no one knew who they were.

𝟯. When they first found the bodies what they did was exactly what happened on February 26-27 i.e. they folded the tent, brought the bodies to the morgue and waited for the investigator to arrive, identify the bodies etc. this was the normal practice.

𝟰. This is not what happened though.

Unprecedented search operation was launched from higher up to prove at the peak of the 21st congress of Khrushchev (January 27 to February 5) that the Party cared for their people.

In socialism there was no crime, everything was contributed to individuals' fault, and people were sent to the gulags for nothing.

All the problems were solved by punishing the men in charge.

This was always the case.

Since this was turned into a high profile exemplary case the people that would be found guilty will be the ones at the top of whatever entity they will find responsible.

In the Dyatlov case 5 people were fired from the UPI sports club.

If the tent was found in someone's workplace they would be made scapegoats.

If their blasting caused the tree to fall we will never know.

I don't think so.

But the bosses in Ivdel (Ivdellag, railway troops and Northern Geological Expedition) feared they might be blamed for the hikers’ deaths.

The mess began because they colluded with party members and local police to cover up the real reason for the young people’s deaths.

They removed the bodies from the morgue in the penal colony, and did what they could under the flying helicopters.

This could explain the sightings of helicopter pilots of the tent and bodies at a different place and time earlier than the official discovery.

𝟱. The area of the cedar has been trampled 4 times and it is hard to determine which is left when.

This is why the snow cover is so strange.

𝗙𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁 time by the Dyatlov group.

If the tree started the chain of events then it is the one with the most snow on top.

𝗦𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗱 come the geologists who found the bodies, but they are not trying to cover anything up.

𝗧𝗵𝗶𝗿𝗱 time's when 20 days later the conspirators return with bodies and lie them basically where they found them because they can not cover all the traces around the cedar in addition to some more bodies that they don't have found.

The way the skis and items change in the case files says that the conspirators didn't even know the number of the hikers in the group because there was equipment and items for 8 people, and then miraculously around the tent were found items for a 9th person.

When they first laid down the items found in the tent for identification, Yudin, the 10th member, said that someone must be butt naked.

Then we have the swapping of clothes, also some of the bodies are clean, others are not... the discrepancies are too many.

𝗙𝗼𝘂𝗿𝘁𝗵 time the cedar gets a visit from the UPI students searchers who "found" the bodies for the second time.

From “Unnatural death” by Michael Baden MD: "𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘸𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘶𝘳𝘴, 𝘸𝘩𝘪𝘤𝘩 𝘪𝘴 𝘸𝘩𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘤𝘦𝘯𝘦 𝘭𝘰𝘰𝘬𝘦𝘥 𝘭𝘪𝘬𝘦 𝘮𝘶𝘳𝘥𝘦𝘳.

𝘈𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘶𝘳𝘴 𝘢𝘭𝘸𝘢𝘺𝘴 𝘤𝘢𝘶𝘴𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘧𝘶𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯.

𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘥𝘰𝘯'𝘵 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘻𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘦𝘲𝘶𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘥𝘰𝘪𝘯𝘨."

On the photo nurse Pelageya Ivanovna Solter (in profile) and Iosif Davydovich Prudkov (center) who examined the bodies when they were first brought to the Ivdel zone morgue.

Read more → https://dyatlovpass.com/interview-solter

#dyatlovpass #1079book

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

**fortyck** · 14 Stycznia

𝗤𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻: How does staging theory come along with loose photos named "Dyatlov group preparing the tent for their last night alive, photo is taken around 3 pm on February 1"?

𝗔𝗻𝘀𝘄𝗲𝗿 𝗣𝗮𝗿𝘁 𝗜: Since these photos are not part of a film to prove that they are actually the last ones taken by the Dyatlov group (if taken by the Dyatlov group at all - see Part II below), our interpretation is that the hikers are digging the hole on the ridge to leave supplies before going down in the forest to spend the night.

There was an option after Otorten to continue on the ridge, this is what was written in their trek plan: to go over from the upstream of the Auspiya River on the eastern slope of the Ural Range to the upstream of the Unya River on the western slope.

If they leave the cache on the ridge, no matter what they decide on the way back, they could pick up their supplies without losing altitude and without having to carry the weight uphill.

And another thing, Pashin said that the tent was discovered by a pennon.

It is possible that in early February it was the cache that was discovered at that place by the pennon, because the tent certainly was not (discovered by a pennon).

The hikers had left the cache in the wind shadow zone, with the depth of the snow sufficient to dig a hole.

The cache site, according to our theory, might have been the first thing to be discovered on the ridge.

It was naturally dug up and its contents transported to Ivdel by the geologists that first found the bodies.

By the time paranoia kicked in and the tent had to be staged there was no better location for it than the flattened area where the cache was because this way any small objects that would later be found (and they kept popping up) could be explained by the tent being pitched there.

After giving such a nice explanation I have to say that to all researchers these photographs are very problematic to link to the case in general, no matter what you believe is depicted on them.

I gave you the explanation so you don't think I am trying to question the photos only because they don't fit our theory.

The fact that these photos are questionable remains.

Please keep reading Part II.

𝗔𝗻𝘀𝘄𝗲𝗿 𝗣𝗮𝗿𝘁 𝗜𝗜: Galina Sazonova "Discrepancies in the Resolution to close the case"

https://dyatlovpass.com/ivanov-resolution#8

These photos are the basis on which Lev Ivanov wrote in his conclusion to close the case: "In one of the cameras the last frame shows the moment of excavation of snow for the installation of the tent.

Considering that this frame was shot with an exposure of I/25 seconds, with a diaphragm of 5.6 at a film sensitivity of 65 Un. GOST, and taking into account the density of the frame, we can assume that the hikers started the installation of the tent around 5 pm 1.II.59.

A similar picture was taken with another camera.

After this time, no records and no photos were found."

Lev Ivanov is lying through his teeth.

𝟭. These photos belong to the category of "loose photos", the source is not known.

They are NOT part of the criminal case (and they must be, if they were examined), the frames are NOT from any of Dyatlov group members' films.

https://dyatlovpass.com/trek-photos

In the materials of the criminal case, there is NO document of the examination for establishing the time when the pictures were taken, as well as there are no documents reflecting the state of the cameras.

https://dyatlovpass.com/case-files

Thus, this statement of Ivanov is not at all confirmed by any of the materials of the criminal case.

𝟮. The shutter speed, aperture, ISO is not enough to draw a conclusion about the time when a picture is taken, since the illumination is affected not only by the time of day, but also by cloudiness, poor visibility due to snow and so on.

𝗡𝗼𝘁𝗲: It is precisely this 5 pm that the countdown of when they left the site of the last stop is based: "Dyatlov, as the head of the group, made a gross mistake, expressed in the fact that the group began the ascent of I.II.59 only in 15-00"

So his whole conclusion is crap.

Igor Pavlov (RIP), my mentor in this case, tried to gather all the information he could about how these photos got introduced.

This is all the mentions of thee photographs and I have followed all the leads:

I have tried to put together all the information regarding the origin of the so-called “last photos of the Dyatlov group" (in the sense of setting up a tent, or more precisely, digging a hole in the snow, allegedly by the Dyatlov group, supposedly to pitch a tent on a slope).

I am writing this way without any ulterior motive, at the moment no one has provided evidence that it is the Dyatlov group in the photo exactly on Feb 1 digging a hole to pitch a tent.

This is all we know:

1. Borzenkov’s statement that there are no such photographs in the case files.

2. Koskin’s statement that Yudin saw these photographs at the police.

3. Buyanov’s statement that he first saw this photograph in the book UPI (USTU-UPI: People. Years. Hobbies. Volume I. Man, sports, nature. / P.I. Bartolomey, V.F. Bogomolov, V. N. Davydov, E. G. Zinovyev, V. G. Karelin, V. I. Kovalev, A. V. Lebedihin, A. A. Puzanov , B.N.Sergeev, R.I.Silin, S.Ya.Kharin, M.M.Yurganov, V.G.Yakimenko.

Ekaterinburg: USTU, 1999. 324 p.: ill. ISBN 5-230-06601-6 ;

V.I. Grokhovsky, A.Yu. Yagovkin, A.P. Murzin, G.A. Ptitsyn, A.A. Mikhailov, A.E. Piratinsky, N.A. Rundkvist, took part in collecting materials and conducting interviews.

V.I.Kochurov, L.V.Sharapova

Photo materials: V.I.Grokhovsky, A.P.Murzin, G.A.Ptitsyn, V.I.Kholostykh, V.N.Davydov, I.B.Tkachenko, B.A. Cherepkov, A.A. Borzunov)

4. Buyanov’s statement that, according to Brusnitsyn, it was Brusnitsyn who published this photograph.

Information about the absence of these photographs in the case files was confirmed by Buyanov.

But Koskin’s opinion personally raises questions for me, primarily because the inventory of the 2nd volume cited by Yudin contains a certification record from 1996 that coincides with the record published by Buyanov, that is, he saw the same materials as Buyanov.

Members of the forum have already spoken out about what and from what films Brusnitsyn could have printed.

The UPI book actually contains a famous photograph with the caption: “Hours left before the tragedy. The last photo of I. Dyatlov. Evening of February 1, 1959", but Brusnitsyn’s name is not among the numerous names of people who provided materials and photographs for the book.

There is information that in March 1959 some photographs were printed in the departmental laboratory of the Sverdlovsk prosecutor’s office by K. Svechnikova (a member of Blinov’s group) together with the well-known Bienko.

(https://dyatlovpass.com/resources/340/MK_URAL.jpg).

There were many civilians who helped the prosecutor's office in gathering photos.

This increases the likelihood of photographs from other expeditions of members of the Dyatlov group to have been added to the mix.

Bottom line, we can't prove that these photos are from this trek, all you can recognize in the photo is Krivonischenko, because he has pins (badges) on his breast pocket.

https://dyatlovpass.com/sports-classification

#dyatlovpass #1079bookIn

#dyatlovpass #1079book

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

**fortyck** · 15 Stycznia

This photo is also not part of any film.

https://dyatlovpass.com/trek-photos#loose

But at least we can recognize more people, and they have never gone on a another hike in this configuration.

https://dyatlovpass.com/dyatlov-group-members-treks

One thing all the Dyatlov pass researchers agree on is that are missing cameras.

https://dyatlovpass.com/cameras

#dyatlovpass #1079book

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

**fortyck** · 15 Stycznia

This is what their ski masks looked like.

This is Igor Dyatlov in 1958, Subpolar Ural.

https://dyatlovpass.com/gallery-1958-Subpolar-Ural

#dyatlovpass #1079book

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

**fortyck** · 15 Stycznia

In 2024 we will feature a new photo every Monday.

This one is taken by Konstantin Kuznetsov, an Ural mountain guide

#dyatlovpass #1079book

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

**fortyck** · 15 Stycznia

By January 15, Georgiy Krivonischenko had come on leave lasting until February 20.

Aleksander Kolevatov had managed to discuss the forthcoming trek with Ignatiy Fokich Ryagin, a family friend and deputy head of the Uralgipromed Trust, who was familiar with the area and supplied Kolevatov with a map of the region.

#dyatlovpass #1079book

By January 15, Georgiy Krivonischenko had come on leave lasting until February 20. #dyatlovpass #1079book

Aleksander Kolevatov had managed to discuss the forthcoming trek with Ignatiy Fokich Ryagin, a family friend and deputy head of the Uralgipromed Trust, who was familiar with the area and supplied Kolevatov with a map of the region. See Rimma Kolevatova testimony case file 270-272 https://dyatlovpass.com/case-files-270-272#271back
#dyatlovpass #1079book

Żródło: https://www.facebook.com/dyatlovpass9

**fortyck** · 15 Stycznia

𝗤𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀: 𝟭. Why was no blood found in the tent?

𝟮. Or debris from the tree?

𝟯. If the tent was crushed why was the stove apparently not damaged?

𝗔𝗻𝘀𝘄𝗲𝗿𝘀: 𝟭. The injuries on the Dyatlov group are either minor (scratches, bruises) or high velocity (Dubinina, Zolotaryov, Thibeaux-Brignolle).

No one has an open fracture (exposed bone).

If you read the autopsy reports besides caked blood on Dyatlov's mouth and Slobodin's nostrils there is no mention of any external bleeding.

I am not a doctor, but what got me sucked into the Dyatlov Pass rabbit hole was a near death accident that left me injured very similar to Dubinina and Zolotaryov.

The exact words of a friend were "You look like you have been to the Dyatlov Pass."

This was 12 years ago.

I didn't know what he was talking about.

But to get to the point.

I got my trauma in the back of a runaway truck (no brakes) going down a volcano.

6 broken ribs (flail chest), scapula, collarbone, arm, and head injury.

Look at my X-rays.

Not a single drop of blood.

The only thing that was coming out of me was vomit because of the concussion. http://distal-humerus.com

To explain it in lame terms a high velocity trauma is like stepping on a bag of chips - bones break, packaging (skin) stays intact.

There are no bruises.

You can get all kinds of injuries when falling from way high or getting hit by a car (this is how the coroner explained their injuries, as if hit by a fast moving car), but the ones on the Dyatlov group did not bleed out.

https://dyatlovpass.com/forensics

The idea for the chips was given to me by a student.

There was a group of visiting students in the hospital and one of them whispered in my ear: "Where is the chick with the scapula like chips?"

I said: "That's me."

He: "No way, you are smiling."

I said; "I didn't realize that.

They just gave me morphine."

𝟮. We don't know that.

The tent was folded when it was found for the first time under the tree.

Then it was pitched again on the slope.

The tent was in a very poor state to start with and although examined by a forensic expert Churkina, the thing is that she was given very specific questions to answer and she didn't do anything outside this.

Of course if she saw blood she would have reported it, but stains and debris were not of interest.

We know for a fact that the tent had many more holes and burns, and even that a piece was missing (how come? where is it?) but none of this raised interest for the investigator.

The two questions Churkina was asked to answer were if the tent was cut or torn and if the former then is it from inside or outside.

She wasn't given the tent for a full examination.

Only to answer these two questions.

Tragedia na Przełęczy Diatłowa (1 luty 1959 r.)

Rekomendowane odpowiedzi

Odnośnik do komentarza

Udostępnij na innych stronach

Top użytkownicy w tym temacie

Popularne dni

Top użytkownicy w tym temacie

Popularne dni

Odnośnik do komentarza

Udostępnij na innych stronach

Odnośnik do komentarza

Udostępnij na innych stronach

Odnośnik do komentarza

Udostępnij na innych stronach

Odnośnik do komentarza

Udostępnij na innych stronach

Odnośnik do komentarza

Udostępnij na innych stronach

Odnośnik do komentarza

Udostępnij na innych stronach

Odnośnik do komentarza

Udostępnij na innych stronach

Odnośnik do komentarza

Udostępnij na innych stronach

Odnośnik do komentarza

Udostępnij na innych stronach

Odnośnik do komentarza

Udostępnij na innych stronach

Odnośnik do komentarza

Udostępnij na innych stronach

Odnośnik do komentarza

Udostępnij na innych stronach

Odnośnik do komentarza

Udostępnij na innych stronach

Odnośnik do komentarza

Udostępnij na innych stronach

Odnośnik do komentarza

Udostępnij na innych stronach

Odnośnik do komentarza

Udostępnij na innych stronach

Odnośnik do komentarza

Udostępnij na innych stronach

Odnośnik do komentarza

Udostępnij na innych stronach

Odnośnik do komentarza

Udostępnij na innych stronach

Odnośnik do komentarza

Udostępnij na innych stronach

Odnośnik do komentarza

Udostępnij na innych stronach

Odnośnik do komentarza

Udostępnij na innych stronach

Odnośnik do komentarza

Udostępnij na innych stronach

Odnośnik do komentarza

Udostępnij na innych stronach